Matt N
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Shambhala (PortAventura Park)
They could certainly demolish it legally if they make a feasible case for it being “beyond the point of economic feasibility” or something along those lines.It’s listed right? So it can go SBNO, but can’t be knocked down on the dead of night Wild Mouse style?
Not without a prosecution anyway.
I have to say, it would be odd given that they’ve done all the work on it recently, but Wild Mouse had lots of work done just before it got removed, and look what happened there…
This might be an unpopular opinion, but I actually feel that listing roller coasters is somewhat counterproductive. I get that people want to conserve history, and I do empathise with that sentiment.
However, listing a ride does not force the park to operate it, it merely forces them to leave it standing or apply for permission to demolish it. This means that if the ride were to become economically unfeasible to operate for whatever reason, the park would have to either jump through hoops to replace it or leave it SBNO and crumbling away. I imagine that burdening the park with a crumbling, SBNO ride that’s economically infeasible to operate but can’t be removed certainly wasn’t the intent of those who originally got the BPB coasters listed, but I do fear that that may end up being the case.
In this particular instance, however; while I don’t rate Grand National at all based on my two rides (one in 2018 and one in 2019), as I personally remember finding it far too rough for my personal enjoyment, I would not want to see it removed. I think the issues it has (or had in 2019, at least) are easily solvable with a retrack and/or new trains, and it does sound as though the 2022 work did go some way towards achieving that end.