I was wondering how long it would take for the POP vs free entry discussion to rear its head again.
As many people have previously pointed out, time and time again, when it was pay per ride without wristbands, it cost way more to spend a day at the park than the single cost of entry that we have today. I honestly can’t see how that can possibly be beneficial in a cost of living crisis. People wouldn’t stay in the park for as long and the place would be even more deserted.
To use possibly the only other comparable example, Vienna Prater still operates a pay per ride without wristbands system, and when I visited a few years ago, I’d spent more in two hours than I’d spend in an entire day at BPB under the current system, yet I still had a load of rides which I hadn’t ridden. I left feeling pretty broke and with no desire to return. Not to mention, despite it being July school holidays when I visited Vienna, the park was deserted and most rides were running less than half empty.
To use an example closer to home, think how broke you are after a few hours at Winter Wonderland.
BPB needs a radical change in operation, but pay per ride is not the answer. The world is a very different place to what it was in the 80s and 90s, and I feel that arguments for returning to pay per ride are based on a false nostalgia which relates to a completely different time to what we’re living in now.