Last time I was at the park I was wondering if the big white structure that's part of the turn around was in fact designed in that way incase they had to come back a few years later and re-profile the whole thing.
Next time you go through that section have a look at were the original track would've ran, it's a much wider turn.
The track used to run on top of the lattice work and then was re-profiled. https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4797/40019483494_5525c37c26_z.jpg.Last time I was at the park I was wondering if the big white structure that's part of the turn around was in fact designed in that way incase they had to come back a few years later and re-profile the whole thing.
Next time you go through that section have a look at were the original track would've ran, it's a much wider turn.
I think its a shame the Ark was closed,
I'll preface this by saying that I honestly don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if a fair amount of the interior remains intact, not least because it's not like the space could really be used for anything else... there's only so much you can do with a structure that is continuously rocking back and forth. Potentially everything from the gangplank up to the ark through to the Rocking Pig and Wildest Animal scenes.Random question, but does anyone know how much of Noahs Ark still exists and which bits were demolished, also curious if anyone has any pictures of inside the parts that do exist post-closure?
I suspect that wouldn't be as much as a problem these days. I know the changes were made around the time they started charging for Admission and I think the main driver for that was to stop local youths hanging around/causing problems. Also if they added CCTV, new lighting etc I imagine they could clamp down on that sort of thing if it was still a problem today. Given how unique and historic this attraction is I'm just very sad it closed. I always enjoyed it myself. Also I don't really see how the Entrance changes effected this at the time given under the Ark was a main entrance even before 2008.Can't remember the source, I think it was feedback from the heritage tours, but much of the inside was well rotten at the last report.
It was a mischief nightmare...lots of idiots running the wrong way, shagging in dark corners, and skunk central on school trip days.
Some also complained about getting electric shocks from the handrails.
No idea of fun some people!
Combined with major access issues and the odd screaming claustrophobics, it could be a management nightmare.
That is basically the case, yes. The listing document is rather specific that it is the Ark's structure that is listed, not the props, animals or gags contained within.I'm surprised the Whale mouth was demolished if its listed, unless that only applies to the core Ark.
That final drop on the River Caves is white knuckle!I’ve just been looking at the height restrictions on the rides at Pleasure Beach and I was very surprised to see that River Caves is listed as 1.32m (which is the same as PMBO, Nash, and even higher than Icon). I notice that Valhalla states “1.32m to ride unaccompanied” so surely this has to be an error for the River Caves information?
For comparison:
Yep , that's probably it. The wording of the height restrictions on the website has no consistency between rides and is very confusing at times.It says on the page “If Height Restriction is Met: Children Can Ride Unaccompanied”, so I take that to mean that the unaccompanied height restriction is 132cm and there’s no accompanied height restriction.
Yep , that's probably it. The wording of the height restrictions on the website has no consistency between rides and is very confusing at times.
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Two glorious sunny days this weekend and the park was very quiet both days. It’s really quite extraordinary to see it so quiet when there was so many people in the town - for context, Central car park was jammed.
The £45 on the day price seems to be really effecting attendance.