GJMarshy
TS Member
If Blackpool were planning on building a 300ft coaster I’d be a bit worried worried about the winds, I take it that a dive shuttle is more resistant to high winds in terms of being able to operate compared to ride with a train?
This was something I though long and hard about (hence the coasters orientation)
Winds in Blackpool tend to be either from the West or Southwest, so you really want any high points to be facing away from that!
In this layout the drop faces North, followed by a shallow turn to the East (out of most of the high winds) The Immelmann faces away from the wind to the East. The exit from it is again fairly low with the exception with the entry to the MCBR which again faces East (away from the wind)
From the second drop (facing East) onwards, the heights are lower and the tracks is “Shielded” by other structures in the park.
Also with a vertical drop facing North, even in the unlikely scenario winds were coming from the NE, since the train is facing the ground for the vast majority of the drop, the winds have little effect on it.
If BPB want to go tall, this is the way to do it imo!
Also little question for folk who likely know a bit more than I do here, could B&M’s “mini” dive model (narrower gauge track <7 across shuttles) reach 300ft?
I know those models are approaching 180ft now, which is the same as Oblivion, and not far off the “Chonky” models of Sheikra and Griffon etc.
Might a 300ft “mini-dive” (paradoxical I know!) be a good fit for pleasure beach given how much more flexible its layout can be?
The layout I drew up is for a full-size dive model, hence the large sweeping turns etc. This extends the footprint quite a bit (which imo works well given there seems to be space for it, and it has more presence) but if push comes to shove, would a more compact model work better using the mini model still at 300ft? (Ish)
-Marshy