Matt.GC
TS Member
I have this discussion with people all the time about town planning when they complain about new houses being built and how it's "disgrace that we are destroying the countryside" before I remind them that the house that they live in was a field not less than 30 years ago.
My local council leader wrote in the local rag recently that he gets a lot of letters from the NIMBY brigade about new home building projects in the town. He basically apologised and said that he tries to stop or all but the government keeps overriding him. To which I emailed him and told him that we desperately need more housing and that I'm appalled he sides with all the old, rich (both of which descriptions are practically interchangeable these days), land owning NIMBY elite in trying to block affordable housing for the young.
I suppose the moral of the story is, change needs to be beneficial. Is what you loose outweighed by what you gain? You could argue that a modern Gruffalo ride that kids can relate to needs to replace an irrelevant knackered old Bublleworks that seemed to be lingering on for nostalgic reasons. Transylvania to so called "Wild Woods" however.... err... not so much.