Shockwave annoys me more than it should. I read the Colin Bryan interview someone posted earlier and he consistently mentions lack of height and speed as reasons for its layout (plus money, of course), but Shockwave hits those brakes at immense speed. It carries a lot of speed considering it’s relatively meagre height. It’s just a really dull layout and design and there’s no escaping it. It’s dull as a standup and it’ll be dull as a sit down. However, it’s a solid ride offering at 1.2m, so Drayton are absolutely doing the right thing. And if it gets a re-theme, some nice theming elements (like a tunnel or two) then all the better. It’s a great looking coaster, one of the best looking coasters in the country I think, especially the first drop. Total missed opportunity of a ride from day one, and despite the Bryan’s admirable intentions, Nemesis just made it look poor from the start (showing what could be done with a tight space and massive height restrictions - albeit with a bigger budget).
I think people sometimes overlook the fact that Shockwave is the way it is due to planning restrictions. Even then, they pushed it to the limits of those restrictions having taken advantage of an oversight on the part of the local council.
It’s a shame that that stand-up element is going, but if converting it to sit-down viably extends the life of the coaster, then it should be supported. The reality of the situation is that when the time does come for the ride to be removed, it’s extremely unlikely that anything of such a scale could ever go in its place. Modern planning rules, regulations and systems wouldn’t allow it.
I was really impressed with the theming work done on River Rapids, and I expect Shockwave will get similar treatment.
Whether one likes the ride or not, I think we can agree that it has iconic status, so it’s good that it’s getting some investment.
This is a really good point I haven’t really considered.
Yes, Shockwave is an Intamin coaster, but the whole thing is running on essentially B&M track. There are only a few other coasters out there running on this track that aren’t B&M.
Currently, the only manufacturer making trains that run on this track style are… B&M.
So actually, despite us all laughing it off as impossible; it is actually not that absurd of an idea.
It might well be more cost-effective to just go with a B&M train which may be more-or-less directly compatible with the track, with perhaps some relatively simple design modifications. To design and manufacture with Intamin, despite the current relationship, or one of the other outliers would come with a cost if it were a literal ‘one off’ job.