@Matt Creek
Let me try one more time. Everything you outline above is all well and good and I don't disagree with it - but, you have to see the headline price as a line in the sand, rather than a price that people will pay to enter the park. The number of people that will pay it is negligible, not zero - but statistically irrelevant.
The headline price serves only to provide a perception of value that the customer is receiving - rather than something that will be rung up on the cash register. By the same token, if I go on the Dominos website right now, a Spanish Sizzler is £17.99 - however, if I click the deals button I can collect the exact same pizza for £9.99, a cash 'saving' of £8.00. So, I'm still spending a tenner on a pizza, which is nuts - but I'm getting deal so I buy it anyway. It's all about my perception in the transaction - I am saving money and that's what I want to do, who doesn't.
Annual passes are now £85, which sounds pretty reasonable against a day ticket price of £55, it must be a bargain says Mr Smith to Mrs Smith and they buy passes for their family and queue happily every after.
If you hit up the WDW website right now, you will see that a
seven day pass for an adult is
£324, whereby a
fourteen day pass is
£330. That's not a typo, my 8th - 14th days at Disney will cost me less than £1 each. Same principle.
I understand people's frustrations with this style of discounting because concerns about how far it can go are indeed valid, but we're in a society where people don't want to pay full price for anything, each and every time we open our wallets.
Drayton and Flamingo Land battled with this for ages, whereby their gate price was about half of Alton's (around £25 vs. £50). Alton offered half price tickets, Drayton had nowhere to move with their ticketing structure.
Full price ticket at £25 vs. half price ticket at £25 - there can only be one winner in terms of value.