How do the two things have any relevancy to each other?It's interesting that being owned by the "second largest to Disney" attraction operator, it now has the least amount of attractions in it's entire 36 year history as a theme park.
Unfortunately for the foreseeable future, towers is little more than gothic ruins, roller coasters and CBeebies land.
We may see a flat one day if Merlin get tired of hotels, IP's and kid attractions (yes that's going to happen soon).
How do the two things have any relevancy to each other?
My interpretation of Varney saying they won't be putting back in "non-core" rides means that it's far from certain that Sub-Terra, Hex and Charlie will reopen next season as everyone assumed. I find it more likely that if and when they do reopen, it will be under an IP that they have secured. Perhaps Hex may reopen without one, but not sure that is certain to be in 2017.
The reality is that things like Ripsaw will never be replaced. Merin do not identify with flats in my opinion, and I think once they are gone, they are gone.
I should add that Varney said he saw the future having an increase in operating days and hours.
Don't forget the VR goggles that break every five minutes.Merlin's ideal attraction:
A Sealife hotel, with a single black tracked Gerst. coaster wrapping round and through the shark tank (made out of shipping containers), surrounded by a thirty food high unpainted wooden fence.
I should add that Varney said he saw the future having an increase in operating days and hours.
I think you know that's not true, not least because they will (and do) sell Fastrack for almost anything.I think this 'non-cor' statements can be read as 'if we can't sell fastrack for it, we're not interested'.
The problem with Towers are at the moment, they don't seem to see the importance in flat rides.
Whilst they will never be a main draw there (like fairs, amusement parks and Thorpe currently) they are essential rides to quench up queues on busy days and when coasters break down.
Even five years ago (a time when Dark Forest was wiped flat clean), they had an acceptable number of flats. X Sector had Submission and Enterprise and Forbidden Valley had Blade, Ripsaw and Sub Terra (not really a flat).
In the last five years, aside from coasters, the only park additions we have seen are a failed dark ride, updated cinema and a kids area (CBeebies land) most of which already existed before. In this time, not only has investment on flats been stagnant but we've seen two essential flats removed. Blade and Enterprise will likely follow before long in the next 2-5 years.
2017 certainly doesn't give me much optimism considering they're investing in the target audience (young families) which are arguably best served in the park's current sorry state. This is despite the middle family market offering considerably less prior to 2016.
Despite getting the much welcomed SW8 in 2018 (though it's layout is a differen matter), my fear and concern is that 2019 could be yet another CBeebies land year, despite the rest of the park continuing to rot away.
I get that, but at the moment the park doesn't often get big queues so there's less of a need to have rides designed to quench up the queues. We can't really compare to five years ago when in the past 18 months the park's reputation has taken the worst hit in its entire existance. Visitor numbers are drastically down from 2012, so it's a different playing field.
When the after effects from the crash completely die down and park numbers rise significantly - and with the incident at M&D's having brought it all back, Vicky Balch still frequently appearing in the media, and minor ride breakdowns still being blown out of proportion and making big news, I'd say that's a LONG way off - then we might see more filler attractions like flats popping up. But I reckon we're talking 2018 at the very earliest.