Does anyone know why there appears to be a third station on the monorail as it passes between Runaway Mine Train and Congo River Rapids? It looks as though there's a full on platform on each side of the track, complete with white/yellow line to stand behind. I've been digging around but can't seem to find any info on it. I can't believe I've never noticed it before,
Can be seen in this video from around 1:30
From: https://youtu.be/RUQirFechzY?si=JKHi_uQiaygUWwx7&t=91
Looks like the fire extinguishers on the platform are kept up to date, possibly implying some kind of usage?
They are evacuation platforms, from before they installed the metal grates between the tracks which are now used for evacuations.
They are still used though if a train stops there and can't be recovered, which is why the fire extinguishers are still there.
It's a very wierd evacuation platform. Due to it being very similar to station platform, the ability of it being used as an evacuation platform depends entirely on the train breaking down in exactly that place.
But thinking about it some more, i'm guessing they could push the trains to it in an event of say a power cut, where the main stations were already occupied with other trains.
If you change the width of the train, you're going to have to rebuild all three platforms. Monorails are incredibly expensive and this one's a custom build.The monorail needs replacing with a modern wider train and none of that horrible window screening. I know it's a film but like the ones in Jurassic World. Let's not forget these were made for the 1980's expo and then transported and installed at Alton Towers after.
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
For me, it's all about the financial outlay - replacing the current monorail must be in the same financial ballpark as a new E-ticket attraction (if not more). i do get that there is a need to move people from the car park to the front gate, but is it worth spending 3, 4, 5 or more million doing this? I mean, who says "I want to go to Alton towers to ride the monorail"? Who leaves the park stating that their favourite ride of the day was getting from their car to the front gate?I’m sure there are companies like Severn Lamb, Garmendale, Fairfield Controls, Alstom that could all do a job replacing the trains if needed.
The track structure as well I’m sure could be made to measure. But would they want to?
And whilst you’re doing it surely you’d want to make improvements such as adding air gates to the stations and perhaps an extension to the new car park expansions for the future
For me, it's all about the financial outlay - replacing the current monorail must be in the same financial ballpark as a new E-ticket attraction (if not more). i do get that there is a need to move people from the car park to the front gate, but is it worth spending 3, 4, 5 or more million doing this? I mean, who says "I want to go to Alton towers to ride the monorail"? Who leaves the park stating that their favourite ride of the day was getting from their car to the front gate?
Add in the fact that I only ever hear people complain about the monorail (too hot, too crowded, too slow, it smells, you cant see, the queue is too long etc.) is it something that Towers would realistically replace like-for-like? New Systems (like Intamin's) look amazing, but it would require the old monorail to be completely removed and replaced, with all new stations and likely new alignments too.
I know I got roasted previously for saying this, but shuttle busses or land trains/ trams on a dedicated roadway make so much sense from initial cost, reliability and ongoing operational costs. With minimal re-alignment of existing pathways, this is more than achievable. Maybe not as flashy - but how many people really care *that much* about how they get to the gate.