GJMarshy
TS Member
Thing is, running shuttle buses is definitely far more efficient given the distances involved, so you can see why they'd be reluctant to invest in the Monorail. The question arises though, do the park see the Monorail as an experience?
In my view they certainly should. Theme parks are all about escapism. As soon as you start putting people on a bus they're straight back home trying to get to work/uni/college/school on time. Yes monorails are in most cases inferior to buses in terms of operational efficiency, but in the context of a "Theme"park, they're an important way of maintaining escapism. They still feel futuristic to people today!
If I were Towers, I'd be investing heavily in the Monorail ASAP before it gets any more dilapidated. Buy some new walk-through trains with higher capacities, remove the need for driver operation completely with signalling upgrades, and make the stations feel a little more magical. Your first impression of the park shouldn't be a rear extension of a garden centre.
In my view they certainly should. Theme parks are all about escapism. As soon as you start putting people on a bus they're straight back home trying to get to work/uni/college/school on time. Yes monorails are in most cases inferior to buses in terms of operational efficiency, but in the context of a "Theme"park, they're an important way of maintaining escapism. They still feel futuristic to people today!
If I were Towers, I'd be investing heavily in the Monorail ASAP before it gets any more dilapidated. Buy some new walk-through trains with higher capacities, remove the need for driver operation completely with signalling upgrades, and make the stations feel a little more magical. Your first impression of the park shouldn't be a rear extension of a garden centre.