Drayton don’t use +1 but rather +3 except the most popular rides on peak only.
I realise that. But having clocked up over 58 visits last year with a SEN child, it’s not how they implement it at all. That been on their website all last year to.
Guest services were told to do whatever they can to prevent guests being split and use their own judgment when they can use +3.
We had 6 trips where we were asked to stick to +1 on stormforce, shockwave and accelerator but could use +3 everywhere else
Whilst this would likely halve the number of RAP users i don't think it would be publicly palatable. Beyond the reasonable exemption list (eg. 1 parent with 2 children) you'd basically be forcing people to spend what is supposed to be a family day out for many separated into two groups.
That being said i do know that Drayton use the 1 carer system so evidently it is viable.
If I go to a park with 10 mates and we want to ride together we can. In an ideal world this should be no different for a person needing support.Most European parks have a max 1 carer limit. Even family parks, and given the challenges the Merlin parks seem to have they need to be far stricter than currently. Even if they reverted back after a while.
Am I misunderstanding, or did you want to leave the baby on the platform whilst you rode a coaster?Felt abusive to the system but since they won't let us leave the baby unattended
Two adults and a baby can't use rap and swap?It screws us over as our group would usually be 2 adults & a baby. With the additional factor of not being allowed to combine RAP and Parent Swap for reasons it makes it slightly complicated for us at the moment. At Chessie we ended up being 4 adults, including 2 RAP users and the baby. Felt abusive to the system but since they won't let us leave the baby unattended didn’t have much choice. Though for things like Gruffalo we didn't have both passes going at the same time.
Most European parks have a max 1 carer limit. Even family parks, and given the challenges the Merlin parks seem to have they need to be far stricter than currently. Even if they reverted back after a while.
No changes would be publicly palatable because many have gotten used to being able to abuse the system. When Legoland bought in the Q-Bot the Facebook pages were full of rage over it.
Two adults and a baby can't use rap and swap?
Are we to presume after all these years that a parent with a child will not have rap needs then?
I love the Towers black and white decisions against all shades of grey.
Bring in the qbots or smartphone access systems, the technology is out there.
If I go to a park with 10 mates and we want to ride together we can. In an ideal world this should be no different for a person needing support.
If you were designing a ride access scheme from the start, every ride would have an accessible waiting room with suitable facilities near the platform. A person needing support would wait in there for the same length of time as the queue length with a companion. And if said person has a dozen mates in the queue, they should be able to wait until those people reach the front of the queue and ride with them. I know this may be seen to be 'utopia' to some, but it is something a place like towers could implement both in terms of space and finances.
Am I misunderstanding, or did you want to leave the baby on the platform whilst you rode a coaster?
Is is though? There are conflicting but perfectly reasonable safety rules here:
- wheelchair users must be accompanied on rides (in case of breakdown/evac)
- anyone under the height limit cannot ride
- young children cannot be left unsupervised
As an operator, I would not be inclined to allow any of the above to be waived. Am I missing something?
This worked perfectly using the BPB quebot system some years ago...using speedypass, but the principle and pacing was the same as could be done for rap...If I go to a park with 10 mates and we want to ride together we can. In an ideal world this should be no different for a person needing support.
If you were designing a ride access scheme from the start, every ride would have an accessible waiting room with suitable facilities near the platform. A person needing support would wait in there for the same length of time as the queue length with a companion. And if said person has a dozen mates in the queue, they should be able to wait until those people reach the front of the queue and ride with them. I know this may be seen to be 'utopia' to some, but it is something a place like towers could implement both in terms of space and finances.
you just need a real time, fair waiting qbot/smartphone system.
We took him to Pirate takeover for his first trip to towers and used RAP - interestingly we were told theyre experimenting with adding a shorter wait then the main queue (as a policy decision) by 50% to counter any additional waiting in the RAP queue.
Since we encourage him to queue when he can (20 mins or less) we only used it twice but was interesting to see the main octonaughts queue at 65 mins but the lock out on his RAP at 25.
Might be old news but was a bit odd for us anyway
We took him to Pirate takeover for his first trip to towers and used RAP - interestingly we were told theyre experimenting with adding a shorter wait then the main queue (as a policy decision) by 50% to counter any additional waiting in the RAP queue.
Since we encourage him to queue when he can (20 mins or less) we only used it twice but was interesting to see the main octonaughts queue at 65 mins but the lock out on his RAP at 25.
Might be old news but was a bit odd for us anyway
We took him to Pirate takeover for his first trip to towers and used RAP - interestingly we were told theyre experimenting with adding a shorter wait then the main queue (as a policy decision) by 50% to counter any additional waiting in the RAP queue.
Since we encourage him to queue when he can (20 mins or less) we only used it twice but was interesting to see the main octonaughts queue at 65 mins but the lock out on his RAP at 25.
Might be old news but was a bit odd for us anyway