Benzin
TS Member
If they wanted to be spiteful nothing stopping them retroactively applying it to existing bookings.
Truly would be problems. Not that it would affect Mrs Benzin as she would qualify for the changed criteria.
If they wanted to be spiteful nothing stopping them retroactively applying it to existing bookings.
If they wanted to be spiteful nothing stopping them retroactively applying it to existing bookings.
As ever, no email received. Wonder what we need to do to get these emails sent to us, requesting multiple times doesn't seem to work.It's in the email that was sent to RAP users from Merlin this afternoon.
Basically if you miss the initial consent from when you initially sign up, too late. Been a thing with map orders for a whileAs ever, no email received. Wonder what we need to do to get these emails sent to us, requesting multiple times doesn't seem to work.
I receive the RAP emails but don't have a MAP, unless it's from when I used to have one of the old Towers' Season PassesBasically if you miss the initial consent from when you initially sign up, too late. Been a thing with map orders for a while
The change in criteria is the big concern. They’re ultimately weeding out the neurodivergent, who likely form the majority of users but its such a wide definition that some are going to unfairly get disqualified.
I would argue this is a Nimbus problem, if you can’t tolerate crowds that would suggest you should have access to reserved spaces in concerts etc, a queue isn’t a crowd, it’s a linear progression of people.
If you can’t wait in a queue because your neurodivergence means you can’t manage being in a restricted area of movement for a period of time that needs its own definition.
