It can sometimes be hard to compare coasters, there are so many different variables that can affect things. However I feel that comparisons can be drawn between The Smiler and Helix at Liseberg.
They are both long coasters. They both have lots of inversions (14 on The Smiler, 7 on Helix). They both have two lifts/launches. They both drop out of the station into an inversion. They both have airtime hills They were both the biggest ever investment for their respective parks. They were both built on tricky terrain. They both have a mobile phone game. They both have a soundtrack composed by IMAScore.
That's a lot of similarities. So in theory they should rate relatively equally. But do they? Well to put it simply, no.
Mack and Liseberg are the clear winners over Gerstlauer and Alton Towers. In my opinion the main reasons for this lie with the current mindsets of each park; what was each park trying to achieve with their brand new coaster? Of course they both wanted a great ride to pull in the guests, but it is deeper than that. Alton Towers and Merlin wanted something that was going to be dead easy to market, it had to have some form of worlds first element to it. It had to have that Merlin "killer image" and "compelling proposition" that Varney speaks of. Without any of this it would not have been built. Liseberg had a somewhat different mindset though which can be seen in
this brilliant video from October 2012. Park president and CEO, Andreas Andersen, speaks about the legacy that Liseberg has in terms of world class attractions. He says how Lisebergbanan and Balder are both classic world class coasters, especially Lisebergbanan. With Helix they wanted to create a new classic, something that would get enthusiasts travelling from all around the world to ride.
It is those differing mindsets that set the president for each ride. Alton Towers went to Gerstlauer, known to produce more than their fair share of rough coasters, and decided to cram in as many inversions as possible into a small space. This resulted in a very visually impressive coaster, a coaster that made everyone want to visit the park. However with inversion and inversion after inversion there is little variation in the ride experience. And as we know the build quality was poor, it could be said they paid the price for taking that risk with Gerstlauer.
Liseberg on the other hand went to Mack. They had ridden Blue Fire at Europa Park and loved how fun, free and comfortable it was to ride. This is what they wanted, a fun yet thrill coaster. Helix inverts seven times yet it has so much more than that. The highlights of the ride, for me at least, are not even the inversions. You have the mind blowing airtime or that awesome transition into the helix. They went for Mack and as a result they have a smooth coaster with the best restraints in the industry for an inverting coaster. The build quality here is very high.
As I said earlier, both coasters were built on tricky terrain. One park got it so right, the other go it oh so very wrong. Alton Towers decided to dig out a hill and slap down a load of concrete to build their ride on. Yet it still did not result in a stable foundation. Liseberg managed to build their coaster using footers on a huge hillside intertwining with other rides, trees and rocks. It was a more challenging construction site yet they made it work.
The Smiler and Helix: two similar coasters that couldn't be more different.