Never knew Duel had so much detail!
Yeah, because of the trite lighting it's had for years.
I am so very bored of being critical and had given them the benefit of the doubt about this redo. But the pictures already show some pretty poor decisions in this refurbishment. Please not another one step forward, one step back.
Theyve deliberately conflated "flourescent strip lights" (just standard true-blacklight tubes) as something poor/outdated, but their "specialist UV" looks like standard LED UV going by the pictures. LED UV produces far more visible light than the invisible UV light that makes the scenery flouresce, resulting in a flat, cheap-looking purple haze.
Please don't be Tomb Blaster's awful 2016 "UV" redo all over again. The whole point of UV is that it maintains total darkness while only the scenery is lit. LED UV doesn't do this unless its very high end. Traditional UV is far better to maintain darkness or any colour that's not purple.
In that above picture, why is there LED UV lights in a scene that has never had any UV paintwork in it?? Other than the floor, which was inexplicably painted over in UV some years ago by the Attractions team. So are we going to get a glowing floor and the rest the room beaming purple? It should be simple. How is this going to improve the ride?
The previous lighting was rushed and poor yes, but this risks being poor in a different way, making the whole ride look like a tanning salon. It will also need the sets to be scenically retreated after many years of scuffing and cheap overpainting, if they want them to look good under blacklight again.
In 1992, it looked a totally different attraction. How come we can't light or paint a dark ride like that anymore?
Well, I won't judge til theyve finished compeltely. New soundtrack could be a very good change to bring back some atmosphere, and getting rid of the £2-budget preshow has been long overdue!