Random question; out of interest, which party holds your local political seat and how safe are they?
I live in the Forest of Dean political constituency, which is a Conservative seat held by Mark Harper. Even though this constituency has had a Labour MP in the past, the Conservatives’ vote share has increased every election since they first won the seat, and I’d say we’re bordering on being a safe Tory stronghold now; Mark Harper (Conservative) had close to 60% of the vote in 2019, and his next closest opponent (Labour) had only 28%… it would require at least a 15% swing for there to even be a chance of the Conservatives being unseated at the next election, and our seat has never seen a swing anywhere near that big before.
In that sense, I almost feel like my vote is a bit pointless here; I will of course still vote at the next election, but I do almost wonder what the point of me voting Labour is if our seat will most likely vote Tory by a huge majority…
My seat is currently Conservative, albeit by 4.8%. It's classed as a red wall seat, although it was a Conservative seat for a good few years before 1992 as well.
Whilst there's a lot of talk about much of the Tory vote just not going out and voting, there's a lot to be said about how the Lib Dems and Labour vote was spread too. The Lib Dems lost their deposit in Wakefield as they all but pushed their votes to Labour. Likewise in Tiverton, Labour lost their deposit and pushed their votes to the Lib Dems. That's the sort of thing that brought the huge swing that we saw last night, especially down in Devon.
Does this mark a turning point in how future elections would be run? It's really difficult to tell at this point. A 15% swing for your constituency for example Matt would've previously been seen as nigh-on impossible to overturn, but under the current situation - not so much.
That's the sort of thing that should really be worrying the Conservative Party, especially if Johnson would still be in power for the next election. Apathetic traditional voters, and opposition parties getting their act together with informal alliances in each constituency with the sole aim of getting rid of him. There'll no doubt be a lot of soul searching over the coming days to work out whether a change of leader can:
a) Put a stop to/reduce such informal voting alliances as parties fight on the merit of their manifestos over previous performance/scandals
b) Have a (remote?) chance of changing the minds of voters in time for a next election
I just cannot see Johnson even remotely being electable in a future General Election, so I think more MPs will struggle to see that maintaining the status quo is the right thing to do. The amusing thing is that if their confidence vote was left to say tonight or Monday, he'd have been out the door. I'm actually wondering whether the extra letters were chucked in by Johnson's supporters to tip the balance for a vote early prior to the election, rather than those who were actually wanting rid.