ChristmasPud
TS Member
I saw way more enthusiasts staring at their phones waving them at their own faces as they stepped into Wicker Man for the first time ever (on its soft opening day) than "the GP"GP just stay glued to there phones
I saw way more enthusiasts staring at their phones waving them at their own faces as they stepped into Wicker Man for the first time ever (on its soft opening day) than "the GP"GP just stay glued to there phones
That's because the new generation of "enthusiasts" are more interested in being the first one to upload crap video of the ride to social media, than in actually experiencing the ride for themselves.I saw way more enthusiasts staring at their phones waving them at their own faces as they stepped into Wicker Man for the first time ever (on its soft opening day) than "the GP"
A ride breaks down on the lift hill and you get evacuated
GP = "OMG, this ride is dangerous, I'm going to die, lets phone the press, what an inconvenience..."
Enthusiast = "Wow, I get to do a free lift hill walk"
Did you end up being evac'd?I think it's an interesting question and I don't think I would classify myself in either category. I think the vast majority of people just go to a theme park as a day out and for fun, while some others may look deeper into how it works and how it looks. I think an enthusiast though probably has a season pass and goes to multiple (even if just at home) theme parks in a year multiple times. It's like being an enthusiast of anything, chances are you're going to do whatever it is more times than the average person.
I think another difference may be how you approach the rides. What do you ride first, do you rush for the big ride far away or just simply go for whatever is nearest or maybe even the one that's your favourite?
For an example, I don't know how others spend their day at AT, but I notice the vast majority of people will queue for hours for say the Smiler or Nemesis. Much as I like them, I won't do that. I queued at the end of the day for 90 minutes for Wicker Man but that was an exception because I wanted to experience it at it's first Scarefest. Ultimately AT is about much more than the big rides. We once walked 42,000 steps at a Scarefest (more than a day trip to London, ouch!) because we circled the park like sharks searching for the shorter queue rides, and got on everything we wanted to go on because we were willing to wait and walk around rather than stay in a queue for one ride. I don't know how many other general members of the public do that. I feel like there is a one track mind "must go on big coaster" mentality rather than experiencing as much as you can in the time you have. Then again, I guess enthusiasts also don't mind waiting for big rides as they are a main draw..... so maybe it's just me and my unwillingness to stand still.
I also like to think that everyone notices theming and how well things look. Disneyland Paris is seared in my memory from 20 years ago when I last visited, so I always look at how a park looks and it's theming and it's something we always talk about when at theme parks. It's also for me an important part of a theme park, but again generally do the public bother about this?
I also like knowing more about behind the scenes.... but technical details are lost on me, and to be honest they don't really make my trips any better for knowing that sort of stuff. Although I quite like knowing which company makes what rides....the information doesn't stay with me for long.
I wouldn't phone the press, but the first time I rode Nemesis after a few years break, I got stuck on the lift hill. My brother says it was for about three minutes... I was already very nervous and it felt like a LOT longer. The ride operator came up the steps, had a nice chat with the front row, guy behind was mourning the fact he'd left his Rolo's in the lockers otherwise he could have been eating them. My brother had a little shuteye..... so it was only me bothered by the situation.
Did you end up being evac'd?
I wouldn't even like to think of the damage that could be caused by someone dropping their phone whilst on a ride like Nemesis. Imagine if it flew behind and hit someone in the face.
And so the culprit gets a good ribbing when they get off.That's the reason a phone out stops a ride. It's when somebody decides to get a phone out on Rita, usually announced by the OP so everyone in the queue and station knows exactly why the ride stopped.
I'm sure it can't be difficult to make safe - I imagine e-stopping the ride will dump any stored energy in the hydraulics, thus it's safe.Rita is an interesting one. I'd be surprised if staff are allowed to approach the train once the catch car has engaged, so it could be a long delay while it's made safe.
Tech services would definitely need to reset the system, yes, but it wouldn't be a fail-safe system if the operator themselves couldn't verify that the hydraulics are depressurised, and it's safe to approach.I'd imagine they'd need Technical Services verify the hydraulics are depressurised and isolate it before anybody can approach, rather than assume "It's e-stopped therefore it's fine". It would also take a while for everything to be reset, compared to a lift stop which the operator can simply restart themselves.
You're not allowed to have a difference of opinion on here, everyone knows that.I think that list is just someone who has a different opinion to many on here; difference of personal opinion is perhaps one of my favourite things about the world!
You also have an insatiable desire to list / rank things so double whammy for you!I think that list is just someone who has a different opinion to many on here; difference of personal opinion is perhaps one of my favourite things about the world!
I think that list is just someone who has a different opinion to many on here; difference of personal opinion is perhaps one of my favourite things about the world!