The Traitors (WARNING: Potential spoilers!)

[BSwiss]

Dodgy behaviour, a tell which potentially falls in to the former category of 'totally subject to whatever we see in the edit', but not a misplay.

But there are two mistakes in that sequence. Carr’s slip-up, which could be a categorised as a misstep. And the group’s inability to use that to corroborate evidence against Carr, which is a misplay.

You’ve fallen into the same trap as many faithfuls by stating that sequence was subject to the edit, when you haven’t applied the same grace to the evidence you’ve gathered against traitors. It’s evidence when it supports your theory, but circumstantial when it opposes your theory.

And for that reason, I’ll be voting you out at tonight’s round table.

 

[Tim]

I certainly think there have been more smart moments in this series then the celebrity one. But that's not to say there havn't been some seriously dumb moments too.
On two occasions (when the painting was marked and Amanda made her reveal) there was literally anouther player who was shooed from the room moments before. Yet no one commented on that. And Rachel has now had 2 people call her out, yet the round table after she didn't get a single vote.

However the reason I call out the celebrity series is because Jo was the only one who seemed to be truly thinking about who the traitors could be. For example Stefan fry is a very smart man, but none of his votes came across as anything more than stabs in the dark. Had Jo not attempted that amazing save at the end the series would have ended quite poorly.

In this series however there's been a number of players that have seemed really switched on. Their big fault is they never seem to carry over suspicious from day to day. Those that have are spotting the patterns and getting genuinely close to catching them out.

 

[WillPS]

You’ve fallen into the same trap as many faithfuls by stating that sequence was subject to the edit, when you haven’t applied the same grace to the evidence you’ve gathered against traitors. It’s evidence when it supports your theory, but circumstantial when it opposes your theory.

No I haven't. We know Rachel gathered everyone for her big reveal after the round table set piece and before carriages. Other than editing the whole thing out (which they didn't do), or removing something from the statement or context which would have made declaring it a bit more justified, I don't see what else is pertinent.

Forgetting you have a shield is not objectively more good or more bad, it is either way a stupid thing to do.