Legoland have today released a ‘Gold’ pass priced at £119 with free parking and merch/food discounts, so it seems the Merlin attractions are aligning the benefits/names/pricing on their individual passes. Makes sense.
Here it is, Alton Towers Gold pass - £119 for a year.
Free parking, 20% off food and merchandise, 20% off Dungeons, Waterpark, Golf, Spa and hotel stays. Three £5 off Fastrack vouchers and 3x Bring a Friend for £15.
https://www.altontowers.com/tickets-passes/season-annual-passes/alton-towers-annual-pass/
I didn't encounter any of those problems to be honest.The cheap "lead in passes" caused a two class system...
I have the money, so I can push in with paid fasttrack.
I don't have the money, so instead of queueing for twenty minutes, which is acceptable, I have to let a thousand people ride before me, because they have paid an extra fifty quid to push in.
The problem was nothing like as bad when passes were more expensive.
Cheap passes caused massive capacity issues as well.
Booking should be easier when there aren't a million discounted pass holders.
I think this is just a clumsy written job spec - there was a post in another thread that highlighted a grammar/spelling mistake in a job description for a marketing role so maybe the person writing up job adverts isn’t the best at wording things, which is odd for a company of Merlin’s size and park history because you’d think a job spec would need to be signed off by a senior manager.I wasn’t sure where to put this, or indeed whether to post it at all as perhaps people will disagree, but Alton Towers are currently advertising for electrical and mechanical engineers.
Nothing strange in that of course. But a line in the job descriptions for both roles caught my eye.
It’s the last line in the above screenshot. Considering the events of the recent past at the park, and the fact it was identified that pressure from the company on engineers to minimise downtime was a contributing factor in the Smiler incident, this sentence concerns me.
Now of course it doesn’t mean on its own that there is an accident waiting to happen. But you would expect that if Merlin want and expect a safety first culture at their attractions that it would run from right at the beginning of the recruitment process (I.e the job description) all the way through the organisation at every level. I would expect that an engineers number one priority would be safety, not making attractions available to guests (of course that is one of the important duties, but number one?)
I hope this is just a clumsily written job description, but I feel given the history, it shouldn’t be possible for the culture of the company to allow it to go out written like that.
You might think it's stupid or that you couldn't possibly fall into the same mistakes. You'd be wrong. It's called human factors and it's something accident investigators spend a lot of time looking into.The events leading to the incident just seem like pure stupidity to me. Seriously how can you override the system which is telling you a section of the ride isn't clear... without checking that section just to make sure
I wouldn't worry too much, it just sounds like marketing guff to me.I wasn’t sure where to put this, or indeed whether to post it at all as perhaps people will disagree, but Alton Towers are currently advertising for electrical and mechanical engineers.
Nothing strange in that of course. But a line in the job descriptions for both roles caught my eye.
It’s the last line in the above screenshot. Considering the events of the recent past at the park, and the fact it was identified that pressure from the company on engineers to minimise downtime was a contributing factor in the Smiler incident, this sentence concerns me.
Now of course it doesn’t mean on its own that there is an accident waiting to happen. But you would expect that if Merlin want and expect a safety first culture at their attractions that it would run from right at the beginning of the recruitment process (I.e the job description) all the way through the organisation at every level. I would expect that an engineers number one priority would be safety, not making attractions available to guests (of course that is one of the important duties, but number one?)
I hope this is just a clumsily written job description, but I feel given the history, it shouldn’t be possible for the culture of the company to allow it to go out written like that.
Seriously how can you override the system which is telling you a section of the ride isn't clear... without checking that section just to make sure
Towers seems to have a high throughput of techs. They no longer advertise the salary for techs in their job adverts but when they did the money wasn't great, especially for someone working in a high pressure environment.