Craig
TS Administrator
There's almost certainly a soft spot for the ride from Nick Varney, but ultimately it's a very wise business decision, as we need to think of the alternative. What would they do if Nemesis had to close and be removed? It's the headline attraction for that side of the park, still rates incredibly highly amongst guests and is still one of the rides that everyone talks about when someone says they're off to Alton Towers.
As mentioned in the application, the rock anchors are all structurally sound, the only thing they're doing is replacing the supports, foundations and track where the most stress has been exerted on it. The fact they're only doing this after 3 decades of use is testament to how well built the ride is.
If the park were to go down the route of removing it, they'd then have to consider the immense cost of engineering a new ride to fit into that area, or the insane cost of infilling the pit - not to mention the planning issues they would face to go with it.
The track replacement is by far the most sensible option. You're resolving reliability issues, not modifying a ride that's already immensely popular and you're not incurring the huge cost of planning and dealing with a replacement.
As mentioned in the application, the rock anchors are all structurally sound, the only thing they're doing is replacing the supports, foundations and track where the most stress has been exerted on it. The fact they're only doing this after 3 decades of use is testament to how well built the ride is.
If the park were to go down the route of removing it, they'd then have to consider the immense cost of engineering a new ride to fit into that area, or the insane cost of infilling the pit - not to mention the planning issues they would face to go with it.
The track replacement is by far the most sensible option. You're resolving reliability issues, not modifying a ride that's already immensely popular and you're not incurring the huge cost of planning and dealing with a replacement.