I think it really depends on if there is a need to swap out the trains for the new track (I don't understand why there would be) but more importantly, how old the components in those trains are ... none of the consumables will be original at this point.
If the station, lift hill etc are all good for another 30 years, the ride obviously (quite logically) hasn't aged at the same rate throughout.
The consumables no. The chassis yes. Fully original. This is also 80% of a train. It will be the condition of this that determines new trains or not. Due to it being 30 years it old, it is going to have metal fatigue and it is going to need more work as the years go on. So for this specific reason, I think we will see new trains.
Metal fatigue is the main aging element in track and metal like this. It will not age evenly because low stress areas such as the lift and station are exactly that, low stress areas, areas where fatigue will not develop. The chassis of the train, which as I said, are the original, will have fatigue developing like the high stress parts of the track. As years go on, this will get worse. You cannot fix fatigue then the metal performs like new. It still gets worse year on year. Hence the need for a re track. It is not until the crystals are re forged (in brand new steel) that fatigue resets so to speak.
The consumables only make up a small part of the train. That is very important to remember.
As for the stress in the break run, most of it would be transferred straight to the supports which are over engineered for this reason. It is a lateral and not a vertical force at the break run, this is why you see lateral bracing in this area. The trains would see a bit of stress, not much on the track itself. The load transfers straight to the supports via the track spine.
EDIT, thinking about this in detail today at work. Rob666 is correct. However, the forces placed upon the superstructure for stopping a train are mostly compressive, (compressive on the track and spine, more so tensile on the supports). Compressive forces are very very difficult for fatigue and fatigue based fractures to form (within certain parameters). Especially if the superstructure dissipates the force very well (which it appears to do). The tensile forces placed upon most of the free running track is a playground for fatigue to form, especially due to them being quite large, as the ride is quite forceful. But bottom line there is, Rob666 is correct in what he says. Just the way the ride is setup means it deals with the forces in a totally different way.
The beauty of structural engineering eh. I'll stop with the mini science lessons now. Roll on the reopening!!!