Some areas have a general development order so don't need planning permissions. Its the location that is more important than the height.I really hope they get more that the new Topspin. Do the park need planning for all new flats or is it only those of a certain height?
As they're all previously developed and part of the GDO, it wouldn't take much at all to whack these flats in. Other than ££££ of course, but if we are to believe that there's a 3 flat deal (which if there is, we don't know how the contract is structured), the purchase of at least 2 of the rides at least has been accounted for.There are plenty of flat rides they could easily install in X Sector and Dark Forest. You could plonk a Huss Breakdance in X Sector in the Enterprise site easily. It wouldn't be hard to theme either.
I really hope they get more that the new Topspin. Do the park need planning for all new flats or is it only those of a certain height?
The problem is, the park needs attractions and needs them now, not in a few years time. X Sector is desperate. Having this new one in Forbidden Valley, sat upon a plinth with bells and whistles attached, is all very good and welcome. But that would leave you with 5 attractions (4 of which will exclude under 1.4 riders) concentrated in a single location. That's as much as Forbidden Valley has ever had, even in the better times for the park.
Even if they get Hex and Skyride back (will they?), let's face it they should never have got to the stage where they had to be closed at the same time. So their return won't be "additions". Dark Forest needs something in there, and X Sector has been terrible with just 2 coasters all season, the worst it's been, Enterprise being another recent permanent casualty. Then you'll have the usual breakdowns and the continued aging of the rest of the park hardware to contend with over the next few seasons.
They need all 3 before Easter 2025 really, not in 2 years time. And then they'll probably still need another one after that to replace Enterprise to get us back to any semblance of a rounded line up.
As they're all previously developed and part of the GDO, it wouldn't take much at all to whack these flats in. Other than ££££ of course, but if we are to believe that there's a 3 flat deal (which if there is, we don't know how the contract is structured), the purchase of at least 2 of the rides at least has been accounted for.
So even Capital Expenditure could potentially be only a minor hinderance, with logistics and OPEX being other issues, with this whole marketing angle that @BarryZola mentioned being another. It wouldn't take much ground work in Dark Forest, and a queue could be constructed pretty quickly. Even less work to do in X Sector as you have 2 plots already designed for flats that wouldn't need extensive modification (depending on what they intend to put there). Then there's a bit of theming should they choose to add it.
I don't think we'll get all 3 next year. I think Ocean will be seen as the big marketing draw, and if Hex reopens we'll be expected to be grateful. This will be a choice. Either because they won't fund the final outlay, won't operationally be able to cope, or plan to phase them in and market the hell out of them. But there's nothing concrete stopping them other than their own will really to get them in and open next year. No messy and lengthy planning consents or anything like that.
They don't need to be very heavily themed though, Enterprise wasn't, neither submission really. They were just static models without all the lights of a travelling version. The Ugland stuff had more themingIt wasn't so long ago we were blasting Towers for plonking down next to no-themed flat rides in areas of the park for 3 seasons; reading the last few pages of this thread and on X it seems that many people would be happy for that to happen again!! Towers can't win. I'm with @Josh555 - if a couple of years of pain [no flats] means we get some very heavily themed flats over the next few years, then I'm all for that approach.
Why not strive for better though? Short term thinking is what got them in this mess in the first place.They don't need to be very heavily themed though, Enterprise wasn't, neither submission really. They were just static models without all the lights of a travelling version. The Ugland stuff had more theming
This ^^Why not strive for better though? Short term thinking is what got them in this mess in the first place.
What other park in the world goes for heavily themed for flat rides? For flats it can still be great if its a appropriately themed, well-presented ride like all the flat rides at Thorpe Park and Drayton Manor. Nothing as OTT as Talocan, but everything suits its area really (except maybe Rush) with paint details.Why not strive for better though? Short term thinking is what got them in this mess in the first place.
Great. I can't wait and I'm sure it'll be fantastic. But it doesn't change the fact that it increases the roster in Forbidden Valley to 5 attractions, whilst X Sector sits on just 2, Spinball was purposely shut mid-season for some nice to do work, Hex closed for ages, Skyride shut for ages, Monorail hardly functioning, a coaster or 2 going down is day ruining for guests, and that after dusk at Scarefest you could potentially walk between Wickerman and Gallopers without seeing a single open queue line for an included attraction.Project Ocean - By the looks of it we’re getting heavily themed flat ride which many, myself included, have been crying out for.
Phantasialand is in a completely quality league to Towers. Those days are long gone.If the one we’re getting is Talocan levels of theming, or close to that, and us having to wait a year per flat means that each will be filmed to a similar level then personally I’m alright with that over a Thorpe in the early noughties 3 flat style deal where there was minimal theming on any of them.
Appreciate that might not be everyone else’s point of view but if they manage to get 3 flats of Talocan’s level I’d be more than happy to wait a couple years for that so long as there’s a flat each year in the interim.
Yes. In the era of better than nothing, we currently have nothing in some sections of the park. So some lighter themed flats than we'd all want to see, even if they were less so than what came before them, is better than flat paving, abandoned queue lines, food vans, and upcharge attractions. So it would be striving for better, some new permanent rides or another season like this one. As garish and tacky as they were, they should never have pulled the shutters up this season without those fun fair flats until they'd replaced them all.Why not strive for better though? Short term thinking is what got them in this mess in the first place.