With the post DMP safety rules on water rides, I don't think we'll see anything that doesn't have proper restraintsI personally think one ride (in addition to flats) that will go a long way towards resolving the capacity and variety issues is to add in a modern flume style ride to the park. That would be at least an additional 1200pph of capacity on it's own.
With Chiapas and some of the flumes from Intamin using lap bars, I'd say there's ways they can bring a water ride in.With the post DMP safety rules on water rides, I don't think we'll see anything that doesn't have proper restraints
They need to bring in restraints with tech to resolve the "flip issue". It's not rocket science. When seat belts were introduced they were static restraints (like on an airplane). Then we had the inertia reel, then pre-tensioners and airbags. Can't be that difficult to do the same for water rides - mercury switch combined with tech?? Of course it can "not work" and drown people, in the same way an asteroid can hit Earth and kill us all.I'm thinking that I'm more concerned about Rapids rides in the future.
there are many problems with this here are 2 of the key problems:They need to bring in restraints with tech to resolve the "flip issue". It's not rocket science. When seat belts were introduced they were static restraints (like on an airplane). Then we had the inertia reel, then pre-tensioners and airbags. Can't be that difficult to do the same for water rides - mercury switch combined with tech?? Of course it can "not work" and drown people, in the same way an asteroid can hit Earth and kill us all.
Well I have several patents to my name, and some software on satellites (specifically related to power) - so not unaccustomed to solving problems. (My wife says I talk about this waaaay to much)
The bottom of a raft is always in contact with the water, so there's one thing. A mercury switch (first thing I thought of) is perfectly implementable. And any system that creates false positives is fine - human behaviour would suggest people re-insert their seat belts rather than use it as an opportunity to do dangerous things.
As for the power, a Li-Ion battery will last for weeks in monitoring these things between charges. In terms of engineering marvels, this isn't one of them.
I have created another topic to discuss this on:Well I have several patents to my name, and some software on satellites (specifically related to power) - so not unaccustomed to solving problems. (My wife says I talk about this waaaay to much)
The bottom of a raft is always in contact with the water, so there's one thing. A mercury switch (first thing I thought of) is perfectly implementable. And any system that creates false positives is fine - human behaviour would suggest people re-insert their seat belts rather than use it as an opportunity to do dangerous things.
As for the power, a Li-Ion battery will last for weeks in monitoring these things between charges. In terms of engineering marvels, this isn't one of them.