Dave
TS Founding Member
This is just totally theoretical from me, so take it with a pinch of salt. I think they (AT) generally have a sympathetic ear at the council as far as can reasonably expected (apart from things like seeing track above the treeline etc which is a line that should not be crossed). Not sure if you noticed but the guy leading the meetings for the planning decision which was passed on Project Horizon was an ex-Towers employee (and it was passed very easily by the council overall) so I believe that they have some idea of the absolutely real budget constraints put upon Towers by Merlin. Maybe this is why when they know that Merlin are finally opening their wallets for a capex project every several years they know that it's their very occasional chance to get them to do some heritage work as it's VERY unlikely to come out of normal operating budget. I think what I'm trying to say is that the council sort of cut them slack on normal every day stuff like keeping the Towers ruins open etc and every day maintenance in the gardens because they are aware of their meagre available budget for such things, but when they get the chance to have a little bit of power to make Merlin act (to get permission for a new ride for example) then they make sure they get some money from that budget. Seems like an arrangement that both sides have come to live with.
That's just my theory anyway.
The council are generally supportive of AT as it’s a major economy booster in an area that doesn’t have a lot other than JCB. The opposite is true at Chessington, they are far less impactful in the London economy and therefore their restrictions are higher being in the green belt.
The restorations that get tagged onto the big projects tend to be there to satisfy English Heritage who also have to agree to the project.