Log Flume's Dennis
TS Member
I'd strongly advise writing to your local MP over these issues. It's a wonder the general public still visits theme parks when they occasionally forget to use an apostrophe. Disgusting
To be fair, they would have needed a new line for regularly. Possibly a stylistic decision?
To be fair, they would have needed a new line for regularly. Possibly a stylistic decision?
Is it me, or does this sentence not make a lot of sense?Choose from 5 fantastically-themed accommodations, mouth-watering meals, live entertainment, wacky waterpark, extraordinary golf and of course not forgetting over 40 world class rides and attractions, it’s the ultimate UK family holiday!
Yes I was about to take issue with the hyphenation of an adverbial phrase but then realised there are much graver issues with the content...I'm just reeling at the fact they've called the pods "fantastically themed", even though their very own planning application stated they weren't bothered with theming them and then described their food as "mouth - watering". More like eye watering.
On the same page, under the “Legend of Nemesis” section, it also says:I noticed that on the Alton Towers website, Nemesis' capacity is '1400 rides per hour', not people per hour.
What that g-force you felt?
Thinking about it, this could be more accurate, but knowing Merlin, 'rides' could just be a typo of 'riders', which would still count as an error.Now you see, 1400 rides per hour could be argued as more accurate...
Say 1399 people go on nemesis once in that hour, and one person goes on twice within that hour.
In that hour, it has only had 1399 riders, and indeed 1399 people on it, but there have been 1400 rides.
I should think it probably is given that 1,400 riders per hour is the ride’s listed theoretical throughput on RCDB.Thinking about it, this could be more accurate, but knowing Merlin, 'rides' could just be a typo of 'riders', which would still count as an error.