SuperMuscleMan
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Colossus
Well apparently all people who love outside are ment to have the most modern cars. Didn't Londoners get a subsidy?Ah of course, because everyone in London is wealthy and poorly behaved...
Well apparently all people who love outside are ment to have the most modern cars. Didn't Londoners get a subsidy?Ah of course, because everyone in London is wealthy and poorly behaved...
Well apparently all people who love outside are ment to have the most modern cars. Didn't Londoners get a subsidy?
That is a lovely colour combo I'll say.
Agreed, they have chosen well!That is a lovely colour combo I'll say.
Anything better than Merlin all black I'll say.Agreed, they have chosen well!
Like I said not everyone can afford higher value cars. Living more rural and out of city and urban areas is already more expensive as we don't have tubes, regular buses, late night buses and already pay more for fuel becuase we a) use cars more and don't have the facilities urban people do.2005 isn't modern though (for petrol cars).
Be interesting to see the actual number of people this would actually affect. And probably a better method of improving area emissions than the current attempt in Leeds City centre.
To call it a "tax to keep low income families outside London poor" is utter nonsense. There's plenty of low income people within the London boroughs for one, and just sounds more anti-London sentiment than anything.
What is that age? I had a lovely trip to the Science Museum in London with my three year old nephew the other week, taking the train into London and then using the tube to get around. Went really well, and he loved the experience.If you have a family of a particular age it is not possible to use public transport.
I’d argue that this isn’t necessarily true.If you have a family of a particular age it is not possible to use public transport.
Like I said not everyone can afford higher value cars. Living more rural and out of city and urban areas is already more expensive as we don't have tubes, regular buses, late night buses and already pay more for fuel becuase we a) use cars more and don't have the facilities urban people do.
I think popping just a few miles into an area paying that much is a rip off and I hope it backfires on the London mayor. (Much like it has in Bham where a large number have refused to pay it).
The LEZ is different to the ULEZ, The LEZ already covers almost all of Greater London and applies to large vehicles such as HGVs and Coaches. https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/low-emission-zoneI think what they hope is that people will drive a certain distance from where they are to outside the LEZ, then use train or bus for the last portion of the journey, reducing congestion and pollution in what are currently the busiest areas.
The state of public transport that'd likely be inconvenient and not cost effective, it sort of makes sense as an idea, but is also dumb. What would be better than punishing people would be providing cost effective alternatives in public transport so people wanted to park up just off the motorways and get bussed in cheaply and comfortably, but they won't do that, obviously.
Like I said not everyone can afford higher value cars. Living more rural and out of city and urban areas is already more expensive as we don't have tubes, regular buses, late night buses and already pay more for fuel becuase we a) use cars more and don't have the facilities urban people do.
I think popping just a few miles into an area paying that much is a rip off and I hope it backfires on the London mayor. (Much like it has in Bham where a large number have refused to pay it).
It effects business, moral and I query what the £12.50 goes towards. Traveling 3 miles on an A road which should be a pretty constant speed with little idling does not contribute to emissions greatly.
The same could be said for terminal 5 at Heathrow.
I don't dislike London I dislike the people and policy's put in place. We have seen that the roads closed have shifted pollution, caused people to die and have had a negative effect on the disabled community's. Now they are being ripped off. It's yet another tax to fund policy's that have failed under the mayor.
Chessington is a great place and by introducing a charge that disproportionately affects those from a more rural background in my book is unfair. If you have a family of a particular age it is not possible to use public transport. Nor in rural areas possible after 4pm or at weekends.
It’s a similar scenario around here. If I go from my local station, the train journey to Chessington takes 4 hours and requires 3 changes (Lydney-Newport, Newport-London Paddington, London Paddington-London Waterloo and London Waterloo-Chessington South). Even if I go from Bristol Parkway instead, the journey takes 3 hours and requires 2 changes (Bristol Parkway-London Paddington, London Paddington-London Waterloo, London Waterloo-Chessington South).A few years ago I actually drove to Chessington and stayed overnight for 2 nights and used trains to get around London. All the trains in cockney world were modern and high capacity, a far cry from what we get in carrot cruncher country. I fully wanted to train it all the way and would want to again since I live 5 mins walk away from a station and Chessington South is right outside the park. As opposed to a 2 and a half hour motorway trip and quarter of a tank of fuel each way however, this is the route. Price for a return for a family of 5 over £500:
I agree. I think the changes are just an unfortunate pitfall of us both living in a relatively rural area (given that you’re talking about Weston-super-Mare, I’m guessing you’re based in the relatively remote South West like I am).I can't complain about the changes as that's just the way the rail network was designed. Also, in fairness, if I didn't want to be there for park opening, there are later services from Taunton and Weston-super-Mare that go direct to Paddington from my home station so taking out the Temple Meads changeover. Although, due to cutbacks on the Great Western mainline electrification, there's still a load of faff at Temple Meads because they use Bi-mode trains which use electric between Bristol and London but the Diesel engines have to be fired up to carry on beyond BTM.
But still, a 2h20 car journey each way and only using £50 total on fuel Vs a journey nearly double that time costing £500 when there's a station in walking distance at either end seems very off. For that price, I'd want to be wined and dined on the Blue Pullman and carried into the park on the back of an elephant whilst being fanned down with palm leaves and fed grapes.
London is popular and many people commute into London, so the fare will be higher compared to Blackpool where very few people will commute by train.I agree. I think the changes are just an unfortunate pitfall of us both living in a relatively rural area (given that you’re talking about Weston-super-Mare, I’m guessing you’re based in the relatively remote South West like I am).
The pricing confuses me, however.
I’ve just looked at Lydney to Blackpool North (to travel to Blackpool Pleasure Beach)… and it costs £50 at the same time of day, taking 3.5 hours and only necessitating 1 change. That seems extremely cheap by comparison… given that Chessington is over £100 from both Lydney and Bristol (4h from Lydney, 3h from Bristol) and Thorpe is approaching £100 from Lydney and Bristol (3h from Lydney, 2h from Bristol), £50 for a 3.5 hour trip to Blackpool Pleasure Beach seems like an absolute bargain! I wonder what makes the price for a return to Blackpool such a steal?