- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Favourite Ride
- Shambhala (PortAventura Park)
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- Crux
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
pluk
TS Member
This looks vastly insufficient. Really disappointing to see the outdoor winding area called a lazy river and not a rapids.
I do like the look of the artists impression of the styling and theming though, if that comes to be accurate.
The whole thing screams being the minimum they think they can get away with doing rather than striving for excellence or brining anything new or exciting.
I do like the look of the artists impression of the styling and theming though, if that comes to be accurate.
The whole thing screams being the minimum they think they can get away with doing rather than striving for excellence or brining anything new or exciting.
MaxPower
TS Member
The whole thing screams being the minimum they think they can get away with doing rather than striving for excellence or brining anything new or exciting.

jon81uk
TS Member
and two infinity pools and some spa pools, which will all probably be full of splashing kids as to ruin any point of them being nice infinity pools.2 slides, a wave pool, a lazy river and a kids water play area? Wow!
pluk
TS Member
...to answer my own point about sufficiency, I imagine they are using their own hotel capacity as the deciding factor in what sort of capacity the water park requires. Rather than treating as a potential destination in its own right they'll be using it as an add on to increase multi night stays. That might make sense in the middle of nowhere (Alton), but makes none on the outskirts of London. A truly startling waste of potential.
Matt N
TS Member
The one thing this may be relying on is the ability to potentially expand in the future....to answer my own point about sufficiency, I imagine they are using their own hotel capacity as the deciding factor in what sort of capacity the water park requires. Rather than treating as a potential destination in its own right they'll be using it as an add on to increase multi night stays. That might make sense in the middle of nowhere (Alton), but makes none on the outskirts of London. A truly startling waste of potential.
They may be starting small to take stock of the type of demand it gets and what type of market visits. Once they have an idea of that, they could move forward accordingly and possibly green light some expansions. It certainly looks as though the space is there for them to expand if need be.
If they see it as being an add-on to hotel stays and park visits (a la Cariba Creek), then the need for expansion may not be as great as if they see it as something that will attract guests in its own right. The type of appeal this gets will likely only be fully known when it opens.
The Big Mack
TS Member
ChessingtonBuzz are quoted as saying that the consultation is mainly for the building itself (and of course the exterior pool and lazy river). There probably is going to be more to the enclosed part than just a wave pool, interactive kid's area and two slides.
jon81uk
TS Member
ChessingtonBuzz are quoted as saying that the consultation is mainly for the building itself (and of course the exterior pool and lazy river). There probably is going to be more to the enclosed part than just a wave pool, interactive kid's area and two slides.
Then why go to the bother of creating so much artwork showing the interior?
I'm pretty certain those artists impressions of the interior are pretty much what the final project will be.
pluk
TS Member
They may be starting small to take stock of the type of demand it gets and what type of market visits.
If this was something I'd consider even medium sized I might be inclined to agree, but if it is built as currently described they will have no idea if it could function as a standalone destination as it patently isn't one so could never be used as proof of demand.
John_P
TS Member
It's sad when you think how many expansions Rulantica has had in 2 years despite only opening 5 months before the pandemic compared to any water park in this country during their operating years. All I can think of are the extra slide towers that were added to the Sandcastle and Water World.
Skyscraper
TS Member
And those slides in the Elephant/Mammoth will be tiny by the looks of it. I'm not even sure they're big enough for taller guests.2 slides, a wave pool, a lazy river and a kids water play area? Wow!
Does anyone know what the other future competitors are?
Trafford Centre water park isn’t it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
venny
TS Member
I expect the so called lazy river will actually be a Center Parcs style rapids. From what I can tell by the plans there’s a start and end, so not circular and therefore unlikely to be powered by pressured jets in the trough. It also appears to start at the mezzanine levels and end at the ground level. That sort of change in level and the rough length we can see is similar to those rapids style rides found across the Center Parcs and Rulantica pools.
James
TS Founding Member
I would assume much like Cariba Creek/Alton Towers Waterpark when it first opened, this has been designed to accommodate resort guests only. That to me is the only reasonable explanation for the size.
Much like Alton's waterpark, I can see this transitioning from resort-guest-only entry to being open to the general public after a few years.
If so, no thought or consideration for the future and very short-term thinking. How very Merlin!
Much like Alton's waterpark, I can see this transitioning from resort-guest-only entry to being open to the general public after a few years.
If so, no thought or consideration for the future and very short-term thinking. How very Merlin!
Skyscraper
TS Member
Chessington Buzz have confirmed in a reply to a comment on their Facebook page that the images on the consultation are just a pitch for planning permissions (for the structure and not the internals) and are not final. They also mentioned that there are unlikely to be any bigger slides as it is aimed at younger guests.
Rick
TS Member
Good job they're not building a 1.4m attraction next year.They also mentioned that there are unlikely to be any bigger slides as it is aimed at younger guests.