This has been pointed out loads on social media... but... I don't actually remember anyone encouraging mass celebrations for VE day? In fact I remember it actively being encouraged against? Of course (to an extent) they still happened, but they weren't 'condoned' as so many of these posts on FB etc suggest.It's weird though how we're told we shouldn't attend mass protests, but mass celebrations about the war are fine.
The mass attendances on the beaches will also lean towards further spikes, not just this.
Well except in this case surely they can, not because it’s a protest, but because it’s a mass gathering in breach of the coronavirus laws.The biggest problem people don’t understand is that the government are powerless to stop a protest. Unless it’s been organised by a banned group there’s nothing they can legally to stop it.
The biggest problem people don’t understand is that the government are powerless to stop a protest. Unless it’s been organised by a banned group there’s nothing they can legally to stop it.
We celebrated VE day like this. No one broke social distancing. It was good fun. Actually I'd say it was very good for our mental wellbeing.The media was very, very active in promoting 'socially distanced street parties' for VE day. In reality these parties were never, ever going to stay that way especially once the sunny weather and alcohol were introduced.
Freedom of assembly and association
1 Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
2 No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This Article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the State.
The State can’t interfere with your right to protest just because it disagrees with protesters’ views, because it’s likely to be inconvenient and cause a nuisance or because there might be tension and heated exchange between opposing groups.
Instead it must take reasonable steps to enable you to protest and to protect participants in peaceful demonstrations from disruption by others.
The right to protest and freedom of association can be limited in certain circumstances.
Any limitation must:
- be covered by law
- be necessary and proportionate
- pursue one or more of these aims:
- the interests of national security or public safety
- the prevention of disorder or crime
- the protection of health or morals
- the protection of others’ rights and freedoms.
...I don't think we're talking about the same thing? Not the lockdown protests, but the George Floyd protests. I know Manchester's Piccadilly Gardens saw a crowd of around 15,000. Haven't seen an actual figure for London, but here's a shot from the US Embassy in Vauxhall:about 50 people gathered in London's Hyde Park as part of a sparsely attended nationwide lockdown protest. Nineteen were arrested, according to London's Metropolitan Police.