- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter soundwave96
- Start date
- Rotting theming (Kumali's entrance arch)
- Capacity physically reduced on rides (Kumali's second train gone, Flip-Flop and Pterodactyl having seats removed)
- That capacity dropped even further impacted by overly expensive fast passes
- A drop in effort for new attractions. Off the shelf, bog standard rubbish with no effort to really do a whole lot with them.
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Rotting theming (Kumali's entrance arch)
- Capacity physically reduced on rides (Kumali's second train gone, Flip-Flop and Pterodactyl having seats removed)
- That capacity dropped even further impacted by overly expensive fast passes
- A drop in effort for new attractions. Off the shelf, bog standard rubbish with no effort to really do a whole lot with them.
- Favourite Ride
- Batman: Gotham City Escape
- Favourite Ride
- Crux
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Flamingo Land: General Discussion
Craig
TS Administrator
There was a time where I'd agree that there did appear to be efforts to get the park toward a level of a park like BGT. Kumali and the massive investment in the zoo showed a lot of promise for what was to come. However, we've since seen:
The park is quite literally doing the absolute bare minimum to operate now, and there doesn't appear to be any sort of concerted effort to grow. Sure you can argue that the 10 looper shows intent, but that's been delayed time and time again, and I get the feeling it was a knee jerk reaction, purchased with little thought of the work involved. I can't help but think there's a fair bit of regret that they did it now.
Whilst a new coaster should be welcomed, guests don't visit for a single ride. They visit for the whole package, and if they are ending up wandering round seeing massive queues thanks to low capacity rides, why would they bother heading back?

The park is quite literally doing the absolute bare minimum to operate now, and there doesn't appear to be any sort of concerted effort to grow. Sure you can argue that the 10 looper shows intent, but that's been delayed time and time again, and I get the feeling it was a knee jerk reaction, purchased with little thought of the work involved. I can't help but think there's a fair bit of regret that they did it now.
Whilst a new coaster should be welcomed, guests don't visit for a single ride. They visit for the whole package, and if they are ending up wandering round seeing massive queues thanks to low capacity rides, why would they bother heading back?
Skyscraper
TS Member
I believe Flip Flop is no longer at the park now, or awaiting removal.There was a time where I'd agree that there did appear to be efforts to get the park toward a level of a park like BGT. Kumali and the massive investment in the zoo showed a lot of promise for what was to come. However, we've since seen:
I've quickly knocked up the below which I think demonstrates just how dramatically the park is going backwards. Two rides with how they looked on opening on the left, vs how they look now.
![]()
The park is quite literally doing the absolute bare minimum to operate now, and there doesn't appear to be any sort of concerted effort to grow. Sure you can argue that the 10 looper shows intent, but that's been delayed time and time again, and I get the feeling it was a knee jerk reaction, purchased with little thought of the work involved. I can't help but think there's a fair bit of regret that they did it now.
Whilst a new coaster should be welcomed, guests don't visit for a single ride. They visit for the whole package, and if they are ending up wandering round seeing massive queues thanks to low capacity rides, why would they bother heading back?
siralgenon
TS Member
What do you gain from taking seats off a Starflyer though? Surely that can't be saving any money?That Starflyer picture would be embarrassing for a seaside fair, let alone an actual £40 entry theme park.
Stuie
TS Member
I've quickly knocked up the below which I think demonstrates just how dramatically the park is going backwards. Two rides with how they looked on opening on the left, vs how they look now.
![]()
I thought this was just for social distancing
Craig
TS Administrator
I thought this was just for social distancing![]()
NuttySquirrel
TS Member
£20million??!![]()
Doesn't mean that's what they paid for it - they got it as a cheap knock-off didn't they?
Edit: Agree with others that the name is just terrible.
Rick
TS Member
I am sure the project has cost Flamingo Land nothing like £20m but I wouldn't be surprised if the cumulative amount spent on this thing is approaching that figure when you account for the unit cost when it was new, it being shipped to Brazil, shipped to Malaysia, shipped to Yorkshire followed by groundwork, assembly and replacing a ton of parts that have expired or gone missing in transit.
James Watkins
TS Member
Progress!
Source: FlamingoPics

Source: FlamingoPics