It would be interesting to know what would have happened if it were a Friday when the crash happened, would they close over a weekend.
I agree with most of what was said in that post - but I think it over simplifies some points made regarding the operations of coasters. There are some scenarios where you would would want to do the above. If the stalled train had been craned off, you would want to shift the train off the lift - but you would do it in the knowledge that the stalled train was led out on blocks somewhere.Found this on another forum, may be a bit long but its definitely an interesting read.
"In summary, if we had to point blame, I’d blame the rides manufacture, Gerstlauer, for implementing a manual mode (Code Zero) system that can seemingly bypass the safety system, it may just be a bug in the code but its something that should've been prevented and the ride should've stopped it from happening. It was probably a simple mistake, like the direction go Lift 1, its just a shame the ride didn't step in and stop it."
I don't think you understand how the HSE works.Safety and emergency response procedures will probably being reviewed on all the major rides.
I would imagine H&S won't sign off until they are satisfied.
I'm sure the park could choose to open with none of their major rides operating, but who would want that?
Towers will be closed again on Saturday.
Varney is going to be on ITV News shortly, not sure if it's Live or recorded interview.
I suspect Oblivion might be included in this list when the park re-opens but as it's in the general area of The Smiler then it was likely to be closed off anyway with X-Sector being closed as a whole for the time being.
I don't pretend that I do, it was just a guess.I don't think you understand how the HSE works.
No, the HSE only have the power to stop dangerous operations, not close the entire park - so that is why they have only issued a prohibition notice against the Smiler rollercoaster. To issue a PN on anything else, they would need to have evidence that operation of those other rides were also unsafe. You could make an argument, if it was human error, and staff haven't been trained properly, that there might be the potential for problems on other high risk rides at the park. But I suspect any PN issued on those grounds would be highly likely to be overturned on appeal. So it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that only the Smiler had a PN issued, as I suggested a couple of days ago would happen. To issue a PN against the whole park opening, you would need to have evidence that every single operation is unsafe - which of course is complete poppycock, because nobody would ever question the safety of the gardens, restaurants, play areas etc.I don't pretend that I do, it was just a guess.
I'm fairly certain the HSE have the power to stop Towers from opening? Obviously this doesn't seem to be the case.
It would appear the management have taken this decision to possibly ensure all the safety and response aspects of the rides are checked and understood?
Care to explain?
Anyone else banging their head against the wall at Kay Burley's dreadful questions?
Not surprised, that was probably one of the worst interviews i have ever seen on TV.Kay Burley has been slammed on Twitter for her poor interviewing techniques. Hats off to Nick, he handled that brilliantly.
Thanks for clearing that up.No, the HSE only have the power to stop dangerous operations, not close the entire park - so that is why they have only issued a prohibition notice against the Smiler rollercoaster. To issue a PN on anything else, they would need to have evidence that operation of those other rides were also unsafe. You could make an argument, if it was human error, and staff haven't been trained properly, that there might be the potential for problems on other high risk rides at the park. But I suspect any PN issued on those grounds would be highly likely to be overturned on appeal. So it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that only the Smiler had a PN issued, as I suggested a couple of days ago would happen. To issue a PN against the whole park opening, you would need to have evidence that every single operation is unsafe - which of course is complete poppycock, because nobody would ever question the safety of the gardens, restaurants, play areas etc.
I also suggested previously that the 2 cars would be taken into possession to the Health and Safety Laboratory in Buxton - and that is exactly what is happening.
A previous comment suggested the HSE investigation could last 2 years - that is probably about right. It also suggested a decision about potential prosecution would be completed within weeks - that probably isn't true. For an accident of this size, I wouldn't expect a definitive decision on whether to prosecute or not to be taken for at least 6 months, although every HSE investigation proceeds as if it could end up in court.
Whilst Merlin may have been at fault here, hats off to them for seemingly taking the cautious approach to reopen. I have come across plenty of companies who wouldn't have been so cautious, and who definitely wouldn't have taken the proactive approach to other operations at other locations as they have done at Thorpe Park and Chessington. From my experience organisations are extremely poor at transferring lessons learnt within their organisations - it is usually a case of 'it couldn't happen here' syndrome.