Adz95 said:So according to our joke of a PM Jimmy Carr is "morally wrong" for his tax avoidance.
Yes David, because a snobbish moron like you can call someone else "morally wrong". :
AshleeKel said:Adz95 said:So according to our joke of a PM Jimmy Carr is "morally wrong" for his tax avoidance.
Yes David, because a snobbish moron like you can call someone else "morally wrong". :
I agree that what Jimmy Carr did was morally wrong. But Cameron has to be consistent - many of his friends, who are much wealthier than Carr, do the same thing, and get away with not paying literal millions in tax. If it's wrong for Jimmy Carr to do it (and it is), then it's morally wrong for the likes of Phillip Green to do so too. If people like him paid their taxes, the financial mess we are in wouldn't be as bad.
But questioned about his fellow scum doing the same thing, he "refuses to comment on individual's tax activity".Adz95 said:So according to our joke of a PM Jimmy Carr is "morally wrong" for his tax avoidance.
Yes David, because a snobbish moron like you can call someone else "morally wrong". :
BigT said:I going to stand up for jimmy here, I don't think anyone asked the question "would you like to pay less tax?" would honestly answer "no".
It is the governments responcabilty to close the loopholes to stop this happening, until then if it's legal then fair game for not paying any more money to the morally bankrupt governments than nessasary. ( and I mean all parties as there as bad as each other.)
PS I'm going to see him Saturday and find him very funny live, nothing like on TV so yes I am biased.
I'm going to stand up for benefit cheaters here, I don't think anyone asked the question "would you like to claim free money?" would you honestly answer "no"?
Meat Pie said:Benefit cheats and tax evaders (yes even the snakes who do it through barely legal means) are exactly the same thing and both are morally contemptible.
Meat Pie said:BigT said:I going to stand up for jimmy here, I don't think anyone asked the question "would you like to pay less tax?" would honestly answer "no".
It is the governments responcabilty to close the loopholes to stop this happening, until then if it's legal then fair game for not paying any more money to the morally bankrupt governments than nessasary. ( and I mean all parties as there as bad as each other.)
PS I'm going to see him Saturday and find him very funny live, nothing like on TV so yes I am biased.
Let me remix this a little bit:
I'm going to stand up for benefit cheaters here, I don't think anyone asked the question "would you like to claim free money?" would you honestly answer "no"?
Benefit cheats and tax evaders (yes even the snakes who do it through barely legal means) are exactly the same thing and both are morally contemptible. They deny money which should be going to pay for society's needs and that in the end only hurts us.
If I wasn't a better person who believed in universal health care, I would say that ambulances should refuse to take Mr Carr to hospital in the event of an accident. He didn't pay for them so why should he reap the benefits of society?
Sam said:Meat Pie said:Benefit cheats and tax evaders (yes even the snakes who do it through barely legal means) are exactly the same thing and both are morally contemptible.
Although both are doing wrong, I think rich tax dodgers are much more morally contemptible than benefit cheats. At least the latter have the excuse of being poor, rich tax dodgers are just purely greedy. They're much much worse.
BigT said:I suspect meat pie that you have never received a wage packet yet, when you do you may change your tune.
Anyway health care is paid for by NI not income tax so wouldn't make any difference as Mr Carr will still be subject to class 2 NI.
The point is anyway it is the governments job to make this impossible in which they have failed, while it is not illegal he has done nothing wrong.