Screamscape said:I’ve said it before and I’m going to say it again. I do wonder just why so many parks around the world continue to buy Intamin products, when year after year we stand witness to stories about accidents on Intamin machines and countless tales of technical problems with many of their rides. I’m not saying that they are all bad… but I think someone really needs to take a look at the quality level of their designs if we are going to continue to allow them to build rides.
Lets take a brief recap of some highlights from Intamin’s Decade of Destruction:
1999 – Rider killed when Intamin Rapid’s boat flips at Six Flags over Texas
1999 – Rider thrown from Superman: Ride of Steel at Six Flags Darien Lake
1999 – 12 year old killed when he fell out of Drop Zone at Paramount’s Great America
2001 – Woman killed when thrown from Perilous Plunge
2001 – Brakes fail on Superman at S.F. New England, trains collide in station
2004 – Girl killed when thrown from Hydro
2004 – Launch Cable breaks, sprays riders with shrapnel on Top Thrill Dragster
2004 – A man died when thrown from Superman: Ride of Steel at S.F. New England
2005 – Trains collide on Disney’s California Screamin’ coaster when brakes fail
2005 – KingdaKa’s launch systems suffers extreme damage during test launch at S.F. Great Adventure.
2007 – A girl’s feet are severed on the Superman: Tower of Power at S.F. Kentucky Kingdom
2009 – Xcelerator’s Launch Cable Breaks
siralgenon said:Would this really mean it's closed for a few weeks? Will it not open sooner?
Jem8472 said:But will H&S have to get involved? it could be classed as a near miss and then go on from there.
We have the near miss/ accident report at work. If something happens that could have resulted in injury or damage to company equipment it is classed as a near miss. From a near miss report it is looked at the see what can be changed to stop that happening again and becoming an accident.
Its only classed as an accident when someone is hurt or property is damaged. I am guessing they must use the same or similar system in theme parks.
If the cable has been properly looked after and it was still within its operational life then I guess its one of those things. Stuff breaks, things do not always last exactly how long it is designed to last.
Intamin make some amazingly intense rides, but it does seem that safety is compromised. Maybe it's the price we pay for the awesome power of the hydraulic launches.
Tom said:Jem8472 said:But will H&S have to get involved? it could be classed as a near miss and then go on from there.
We have the near miss/ accident report at work. If something happens that could have resulted in injury or damage to company equipment it is classed as a near miss. From a near miss report it is looked at the see what can be changed to stop that happening again and becoming an accident.
Its only classed as an accident when someone is hurt or property is damaged. I am guessing they must use the same or similar system in theme parks.
If the cable has been properly looked after and it was still within its operational life then I guess its one of those things. Stuff breaks, things do not always last exactly how long it is designed to last.
There still needs to be lessons learned as the potential implications of the incident are quite serious.
I don't know if they have to notify the HSE of a dangerous occurence, but they do enforce Health and Safety practices at theme parks so I would have thought they'd need to be informed.
Things do break, but it's about minimising risk. I would say blame has to lie somewhere over a cable snapping.