@TakeYourMedicine I don't want to get too bogged down in the food analogy, but I think it's a fair comparison. If you take the fast food brands and look at their revenues - people want those things and wilfully spend their money there. We spend half a billion(!) pounds a year on Dominos pizza. People know what they're getting and like the familiarity. We've all been guilty of doing that, surely.
Equally, the opposite end of the market is thriving where people want something entirely unique, not found anywhere else, served on the sole of an upturned shoe - but if you look at that market, it's hard to scale it up and the success rate is far lower.
I think the Wicker Man and Collosos comparison is tricky to make work when you look at the markets of those parks and how they don't in any way overlap, not even at all - I am willing to bet that it must be 1% of guests to those parks that are aware of the other ride and even less have ridden it. And if they have, so what - the fire figure is such a miniscule element of two rides that couldn't be anymore different in terms of the ride experience.
Again, the above has an opposite and I think that's back to the familiarity thing, like the fast food example. If I go to a Lego Park, I want there to be a Miniland, I want there to be a Sleeping Beauty's castle at a Magic Kingdom style park, I want there to be a Batman The Ride if I go to a Six Flags park.
Maybe the success of Wicker Man will convince them to do something more daring - bring it on, but if they make something successful and choose to replicate it hundreds or thousands of miles away, I'm not losing any sleep over it.
I am sure we had this debate in 2002 when it came to light that Thorpe were building 'a Nemesis ride'.