Sorry been busy so not had an opportunity to reply.
Gravity is essentially a scientific fact so not a very good analogy.
Have you got a link to crime rate being blamed on police at a pride march ? I cannot find anything. Or indeed immigrants being blamed yesterday ?
France are usually guilty of most things to be honest
When labour get into power they will also blame others for their shortcomings. It's what governments do. Usually starting by blaming the previous government. They all do it.
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
The recent report by the policy exchange think tank stated the police where too focused on whole issues and the Daily Mail plus other right wing press had a fit about some police at a pride event last week.
Right wing news trying to hide the funding cuts impact and blame it on wokeism to excuse the government.
If we are talking percentage against popular vote shall we talk SNP?
The Tories clearly won the last election whatever method you use rightly or wrongly.
PR is a crap system that just produces collation governments that get nothing done.
PR forms governments representative of the vote, I don’t understand everyone’s fear of coalition governments. Germany has one and its functioning far better economically and socially than the UK.
Ah, got it now.
Tories are all racist homophobic fascists who couldn't care less about the majority of the population and are intent on destroying the whole country.
Labour are all the salt of the earth, exemplary human beings who would give their right arm for anyone, cure homelessness and have the country fixed in no time.
My round in crevettes (don't tell Dave!)
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Tories are not all fascists, and not all Labour supporters are good.
It’s fair to say the people who fund the Tory party do not have the broader populations welfare in mind and will resort to certain tropes of fascism to ensure they gain power.
But they don’t work together that’s the whole point and how is having a party with 3% of the popular vote near government anything like democratic?
It’s garbage talk just because you despise Tories and will think of any reason that they shouldn’t be in power.
If a party that got 3% of the vote got 50% of the representation in government then you would be right, if they got 3% of the representation or thereabouts then what’s the problem, their voice is no louder then their vote share.
It’s a pretty much known fact an outgoing PM will not bring through any meaningful legislation against the wishes of the party that removed them, neither would a caretaker PM.
It’s unfortunate that the leadership contest has taken so long and it should of been quicker but we are where we are, the new leader and PM will need to hit the ground running.
It’s pointless discussion around PR anyway, neither of the two main parties will vote for it as it will keep them both from governing on their own ever again.
The leadership contest has taken so long because Johnson made a pact with the 1922 committee so that he beat Theresa Mays length in office (he didn’t want to have the 2nd shortest priministership in history, he also wanted the various benefits of being PM during his never ending summer holiday.
Do you mean like a Labour / SNP one? Certainly Labour won’t be able to get power without the SNP and the SNP aren’t going to vote for PR! That would be like turkeys voting for Christmas.
SNP manage to win in Scotland with a version of PR. The SNP is nothing if not adaptable.
I suspect the Tories will get a bump in the polls but if they don’t make considerable progress in the next 2 years Labour could win an outright majority, or just need a confidence and supply arrangement with the LibDems. The electoral maths is a little different, particularly if the Tory’s continue swinging right and alienate the traditional rural light Tory voter that the LibDems are trying to lure.
That said I still think it unlikely that Labour will get an outright majority, but that more certainly makes PR happen as the greens and LD’s will insist on it.