Describing Nemesis Sub-terra as popular is probably a bit of a stretch to be honest.I said this a year ago but having brightly coloured fairground rides at Alton Towers really isn’t a great look in my opinion.
I had hoped that their inclusion (and success) last year would have meant the addition of another flat ride this year but instead they’ve contracted them for another season except with one less which is the worst of both worlds really.
I’m still fairly confident that the fact they’ve included them again is suggestive that they accept that having more rides and more variation of rides in a theme park is generally a good thing (who knew?) and that it probably will lead to permanent flats in their place but It would be nice if they’d hurry up with it and avoid there being random garish fairground rides sitting around in themed areas of the park. The logical approach, for example would be to reopen the already themed, already (relatively) popular flat ride which has been sat in a disused building for 7 years rather than installing a purple lighted fairground ride directly opposite it in an area which is meant to be post apocalyptic but clearly Merlin disagree
How many staff did it require to run? How much work would be required to reactivate and recertify the ride (wasn't there a safety issue affecting all similar rides in dungeons etc.?)?
Pop those in to the old spreadsheet - it's a not inconsiderable amount of money for a ride which has already struggled to justify its existence and hasn't really been missed.
Don't get me wrong, I will be the first to agree that fair ground rides in what is supposed to be the country's premier theme park run by an operator who claims itself as 'second only to Disney' is a bad look - but the other option, leaving the plots completely vacant, is much worse (with or without Sub-terra, I don't see that it makes a great deal of difference honestly).