I don't know why she is fracking around, sue them for her losses and be done with it, the burden of proof is so much lower in civil court, all she has to do is prove on the balance of probabilities Thorpe were liable for the theft of her car, and even a blind man can see they are, she wouldn't even need a lawyer at that amount.
Been to the civil courts twice Ian...if life was so simple.
The civil court judges do not have the same idea of the balance of probabilities as us general public.
We had a nice lady screaming and shouting at our front door.
We had cctv of her on the path ranting with key in hand.
She carved the word cunt in the paintwork.
We had evidence of her screaming and shouting, a witness to say she was going mental at the door for ten minutes...with a key in her hand...witnessed by next door.
She admitted doing it in the pub to all the locals.
Police completely fucking useless.
Not guilty in the civil court.
His lordship had a nice chat with us after in camera...we all knew she had done it...just not sufficient evidence for the balance of probability.
Still worth every penny of the fifty quid it cost...but not justice.
Needless to say, justice was served in the end...in full.
Edit...pardon the fluffy language, I thought we were in pet hates !
Completely off topic...shoot me twice.