The reaction to this has been mixed and I think that's fair. It's good that they're doing it now, but they should have always been doing it. It's good how comprehensive it appears to be, but it shouldn't have got to the point where it needed to be. This is a three year programme so hopefully the next two seasons see similar work across the park, not just improving parts not improved this year, but keeping things they're doing this year looking good too. I don't think we will really be able to judge it until the three years are up.
After three years hopefully most, if not all, of the park will be back up to an acceptable standard, but after that it's up to them to keep it at that level. Three intensive years and then nothing will only result in them having to do all this again, which is surely worse for them and guests than fixing each issue as and when it happens.
I think it's only fair for people to be suspicious of the motives behind this, how it ties in with there being no real new attraction, ride closures and staff redundancies, but the work is way overdue, so I think we can be happy the work is happening without being all too happy about why. Their motives may be questionable and it shouldn't have got to this point in the first place, but it has, so it's good that it's being done, regardless of why. We're all here because we care about the park, so anything that makes the park better is to be supported, and it's good to see them responding like this, but any negatives, related or otherwise, should still be criticised. Fixing problems that never should have arose in the first place does not let them off anything else they're doing to the detriment of the park and/or guests.
So far I like what I'm seeing, but I'm still sceptical not only of their reasons, but of them keeping this up, which given the recent history of the park, I don't think is wrong, but at the same time, what we've seen so far gives me reason to be optimistic. I'm not convinced they've turned a corner, but it would also be wrong to completely dismiss it just because of past form.
Which I think is the general mood of this topic anyway, so TLDR I think the mood in the topic is fair. Positive about the good bits, negative of the bad bits, and overall strikes the right balance of scepticism and optimism.