Fairly sure that picture is not 1994 (might be wrong), that look like the paintwork has aged a little.
To me I always saw the alien as having an exoskeleton a bit like a crab, if you go back to the back story of the ride the alien was sat under the ground for millenia. It would need a hard rock like shell rather than skin in order to be protected from the weight of rock and earth so it wouldn't be crushed. Being bone/rock grey in colour would fit this.Would it be too much to say I think the new station paint looks better than 1994! The bone grey was good but I feel it would look somewhat dated today. The organic cream however has a real living quality to it, while remaining disturbingly alien.
Great picture on the TLC Twitter this morning.
https://twitter.com/altontlc/status/703514085917388800
The paintwork is good and should be commended but let's not get carried away.this is genuinely what appears to be the mark of Disney standards,
The paintwork is good and should be commended but let's not get carried away.
maybe they'll paint it to match the track?...and the track in the background is still bright white. It's going to look a bit odd this highly detailed cream coloured monster having crisp white track emerging from it.
Pictures?Top of the loop has been painted in bright white as well
Please let us just enjoy the fact they have painted and cleaned the station, I think comparing them from opening day to now is nit picking. Yes there will be fine detail changes but it looks 1000 times better than it did 6 months ago
The fact that it's being compared to the quality of the 1994 original (when it was arguably at its best), rather than just last season (when it was arguably at its worst) can only be considered a compliment to towers. Right Now, I could say it looks as good as the original, and maybe by next year it may even look better.No it's not. It's comparing them.
For those of us who remember the impact it had at opening, and wishing others to experience the same, and having wanted it back to the fantastic experience it was back then - a like by like comparison, which in actual fact, is a compliment and is also down to taste as no one is actually criticising the work that's been done, just which they PREFER, is perfectly normal.
There's areas of concern, but it seems to me slowly but surely Towers are answering those concerns with detailing.
I still prefer the original. Because it was the original. But I am in NO WAY saying the standard they seem to be aiming for here, is in actual fact, anything but exceptional.
No it's not Disney, but then again... it never was!
I am going to reserve judgement until i see with my own eyes, just like i first saw it in 1994.