It might not appear like one to you, but personally, I'm often gobsmacked by its height as I'm entering my local park and approaching the ride's plaza. It still does look pretty tall given that each of the mediocre coasters behind (and under) it are more or less the same height as family or family/thrill coasters. Having seen Silver Star in the flesh for the first time last week, I didn't think that had too much impact on Europa Park's skyline within the park given its placement in the car park (not that it should have that kind of an impact of course since it would taint the beautiful sightlines of all the theming and landscaping). Hyperia on the other hand is pretty dramatic on Thorpe's skyline in quite a few areas of the park, though some sightlines from Stealth are more uninspiring.It’s not spectacle … it’s just big. In fact, I don’t think it looks very tall at all when compared to the impact other Hypers have on their skylines
Almost.Nice video - weird how the people getting off the coaster changed gender midway through the rideAnd no queue!
My only question is: why wasn't this video "centre stage" at it's launch?? It's the best thing I've seen of Hyperia - almost makes me want to go to TP!
Yeah if they did so that I'd hope it'd only be on one train. I've not ridden Hyperia yet and would be annoyed if both back rows went.Thorpe have posted a backwards pov for hyperia on YouTube. Here's hoping we aren't about to lose the best seats to this gimmick.
Yes it is. Probably peanuts compared to the cost of seats. Some people see problems, others see opportunities.
As for cost, all COTS parts. Speakers, amp, music player, power, bit of string to connect them together...So yes, compared the cost of a "seat" it probably does add very little.
Should do them as a random middle row so you're awkwardly facing some other people like on a trainThorpe have posted a backwards pov for hyperia on YouTube. Here's hoping we aren't about to lose the best seats to this gimmick.
I can imagine other problems with the train, whilst it could be possible I struggle to see how they would modify the current rear rows to be able to have backwards seats, they could swap the car but that would mean the rear 2 rows are facing backwards, a car can't be turned around since it is a trailer design.1. Should it be one or both trains? If it's both, then the back seats would be lost to the backwards seat experience which is a desired seat for a lot of riders much like the front row.
2. It would have to be paid similar to Enso as I can imagine that queues will be through the roof for the backwards seat experience with the ride's capacity. I think the best way it'd work would be a paid timeslot.
3. Where would the queue go? Would it be through the exit or would they have to change the queue to accommodate for backwards seats?
That is true - Enso seems to sacrifice 4 seats in favour for 2 spinning seats at the back.I can imagine other problems with the train, whilst it could be possible I struggle to see how they would modify the current rear rows to be able to have backwards seats, they could swap the car but that would mean the rear 2 rows are facing backwards, a car can't be turned around since it is a trailer design.
some other practical problems are:
structure of seat means the peoples legs are hanging down past the back of the ride
the flooring of the rear would have to be extended with railing added (can't get onto a seat hovering above a track)
and a couple more such as having to move the air gates.
I would imagine a lot of modifications are required to a car, or a new car is required.
an image of the rear rows for context:
![]()
good point, I didn't consider flipping the seccond to last row and getting rid of the last row, would require less modification but as you said worse capacityI'm not sure that if they modified the train whether it's 2 or 4 forward facing seats that get sacrificed for 2 backwards seats at the back.