This is my problem with Valhalla and its absurd reputation.
I rode it many times over many years. Was it cool? Yes. Was it bonkers? Yes.
But the accolades is received? Would I pick this ride up and drop it carte blanche into Efteling, Phantasialand, Europa-Park, Disney, Universal?
No. I wouldn't.
Gaping flaws in the theming, poor sight lines, effects permanently temperamental, capacity woeful, ride system iffy.
To me, this new version sounds the same.
I think a lot of this comes down to the rides being compared here being very different.
The dark rides at Efteling (and I am sure Disney) have grand, vastly detailed sets; something that Valhalla doesn’t have. However, those rides don’t have the ridiculous number of massive, ambitious special effects that Valhalla had.
Valhalla in its prime was my favourite ride anywhere. I loved it because it was different to anything else in the world; it was unapologetically bonkers, the result of un-restricted ambition, and had an energy and atmosphere that I am still yet to find anywhere else.
I have never known another ride plunge you
through real fire, or to take you through a room full of real snow and ice. The focus on all the senses, the afterlife, the fact that some of it was pitch black, the booming soundtrack, all of those things made it huge and dramatic.
It is definitely the case that Valhalla is flawed by design; the sheer number of special effects was not sustainable, the ride system was knackered from day one, and there are parts of the ride that were never up to the standard of the rest of it (bin bag tunnel).
However, I think that it absolutely deserves its reputation. It ticks all the boxes for a ride; it’s thrilling, scary, dramatic, it’s a themed experience and it had special effects that were well ahead of its time. I much prefer prime Valhalla to any other dark ride I’ve been on, including the ones at Efteling; that isn’t wrong, it’s just different.
It is interesting that you mention Phantasialand though; their examples of dark rides (Geister, Hollywood Tour, Maus au Chocolat) aren’t exactly up to the standard of the rest of the park, and I’d suggest Valhalla is far better than those!
Is it really competing with Pirates and Chiapas? It’s built for the tourists of Blackpool as an extroverted, spectacular statement ride that was intended to draw in the days of pay per ride. I’d wager 95% of whom have never heard of either Chiapas or Piraten.
I can’t see any possibility of it being built nowadays, but it is and always will be a totally different proposition to those European rides.
Chiapas and Valhalla are very different rides. Chiapas is scenic, upbeat, and focuses of having loads of impressive static theming and sight-lines. Valhalla is a scary indoor dark ride experience; those rides are not trying to achieve the same thing.
I much prefer original Valhalla to Chiapas, it offered so much more IMO. These days? I'm not so sure.