There’s an unfortunate chance It’ll be higher tomorrow as the latest data will include any deaths that haven’t happened in hospital.Interestingly the daily cases on Saturday and yesterday were lower than the previous day but they’ve gone back up today but still lower than Friday.
I’ve had that thought from the start - I have a theory it was a weapon gone wrong. Maybe to control Hong Kong ? Who knowsThis didn't come from a wet market in my opinion. They've existed for decades and are found in other asian countries too arent they?
There is definitely more to this virus than we have been told. The whistle blower being found dead in China will be made into a film no doubt soon.
With little room to surge during a crisis, America’s health-care system operates on the assumption that unaffected states can help beleaguered ones in an emergency. That ethic works for localized disasters such as hurricanes or wildfires, but not for a pandemic that is now in all 50 states. Cooperation has given way to competition; some worried hospitals have bought out large quantities of supplies, in the way that panicked consumers have bought out toilet paper.
Partly, that’s because the White House is a ghost town of scientific expertise. A pandemic-preparedness office that was part of the National Security Council was dissolved in 2018. On January 28, Luciana Borio, who was part of that team, urged the government to “act now to prevent an American epidemic,” and specifically to work with the private sector to develop fast, easy diagnostic tests. But with the office shuttered, those warnings were published in The Wall Street Journal, rather than spoken into the president’s ear. Instead of springing into action, America sat idle.
The second is that the virus does what past flu pandemics have done: It burns through the world and leaves behind enough immune survivors that it eventually struggles to find viable hosts. This “herd immunity” scenario would be quick, and thus tempting. But it would also come at a terrible cost: SARS-CoV-2 is more transmissible and fatal than the flu, and it would likely leave behind many millions of corpses and a trail of devastated health systems. The United Kingdom initially seemed to consider this herd-immunity strategy, before backtracking when models revealed the dire consequences. The U.S. now seems to be considering it too.
Existing vaccines work by providing the body with inactivated or fragmented viruses, allowing the immune system to prep its defenses ahead of time. By contrast, Moderna’s vaccine comprises a sliver of SARS-CoV-2’s genetic material—its RNA. The idea is that the body can use this sliver to build its own viral fragments, which would then form the basis of the immune system’s preparations. This approach works in animals, but is unproven in humans. By contrast, French scientists are trying to modify the existing measles vaccine using fragments of the new coronavirus. “The advantage of that is that if we needed hundreds of doses tomorrow, a lot of plants in the world know how to do it,”
Years of isolationist rhetoric had consequences too. Citizens who saw China as a distant, different place, where bats are edible and authoritarianism is acceptable, failed to consider that they would be next or that they wouldn’t be ready. (China’s response to this crisis had its own problems, but that’s for another time.) “People believed the rhetoric that containment would work,” says Wendy Parmet, who studies law and public health at Northeastern University. “We keep them out, and we’ll be okay. When you have a body politic that buys into these ideas of isolationism and ethnonationalism, you’re especially vulnerable when a pandemic hits.”
Much about the coming years, including the frequency, duration, and timing of social upheavals, depends on two properties of the virus, both of which are currently unknown. First: seasonality. Coronaviruses tend to be winter infections that wane or disappear in the summer. That may also be true for SARS-CoV-2, but seasonal variations might not sufficiently slow the virus when it has so many immunologically naive hosts to infect. “Much of the world is waiting anxiously to see what—if anything—the summer does to transmission in the Northern Hemisphere,” says Maia Majumder of Harvard Medical School and Boston Children’s Hospital.
If China wished to tighten its grip on Hong Kong (or anything else) it would use military force. Intentionally unleashing a virus on Hong Kong, and subsequently it making its way back to China, would be a huge own goal. Poor food hygiene feels logical.I’ve had that thought from the start - I have a theory it was a weapon gone wrong. Maybe to control Hong Kong ? Who knows
The rumours of 40k In wuhan are probably true. I remember the l hi to early on of body bags stacked high. And why build a new hospital just for 3000 people ? At least our government is honest enough to say they are preparing for worse. I suspect China has actually had cases in the millions with a death rate of around 5%
Still - they are keeping us out now - if only they did that early on
Finally today all symptoms including cough have gone.
How’s everyone coping with lockdown ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As stated a few pages back, hard statistics tend to soften at weekends.Interestingly the daily cases on Saturday and yesterday were lower than the previous day but they’ve gone back up today but still lower than Friday.
As stated a few pages back, hard statistics tend to soften at weekends.
Always happens with raw data.
The statistics on deaths are about to be changed anyway...missed the details.
Question - ones this is all over (and I fear it may never be truly over) - what will the NEW normal be?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LolDifferent to the current normal.
The 2m rule is a waste of time, anyway studies have proven that droplets from a sneeze can travel around 6m. We should ideally be wearing masks to reduce the amount of droplets we put into the air. I'm really surprised masks are not used more widely in the UK. They do help reduce transmission. Even surgical masks.
The 2m rule is a waste of time,
It absolutely isn't. Noone says that the virus cannot be transmitted by keeping that distance, but it certainly does reduce the likelihood. They've worked out that's the distance of optimum inconvenience Vs reward based on expertise and evidence that you do not have, they haven't just pulled a number out of their arses. It also creates a just out of arms length buffer against physical contact, which where the huge risk lies.
A few people thinking they know better will be the downfall of us all...