- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter Sam
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- Rise of the Resistance
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- Shambhala (PortAventura Park)
- Favourite Ride
- GIIBBB
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
- Favourite Ride
- Dizz, Bobby’s Yarn Land
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Gröna Lund: General Discussion
Pleasure Beach Valhalla
TS Member
Yh we enthusiasts need to know knot to judge a ride by it's pov (Hakugei)!Agreed.
The ratio between the drop and that first inversion looks like it would clear it faster than it does on the POV.
Alastair
TS Team
Yh we enthusiasts need to know knot to judge a ride by it's pov (Hakugei)!
How is Hakugei? It looks incredible from the POV, though not personally ridden it myself!
Pleasure Beach Valhalla
TS Member
It originally received criticism when it was released but now the recent povs show it being faster than the original pov when it'd barely been running!How is Hakugei? It looks incredible from the POV, though not personally ridden it myself!
Matt N
TS Member
People who’ve ridden it have said it’s right up there with SteVe for them, with some even ranking it above SteVe!How is Hakugei? It looks incredible from the POV, though not personally ridden it myself!
MattyH
TS Member
Grona Lund may be facing bankrupcy
In recent days, there has been talk in the media about Gröna Lund risking bankruptcy if we are not allowed to open next year. How could it have happened like that? It's about three things and we'll try to explain these in a concise way (although it's a rather complicated situation).
1. We were never allowed to open 2020
We were ready to open in a corona safe way, but the government chose to say no. We have therefore had no revenue at all since autumn 2019. Did you know that all other countries in Europe opened their amusement parks in the same safe way? Learn more about how we can open carefully at www.gronalund.com.
2. We have not received any targeted financial compensation
Despite being forced to stay closed, we have not received any targeted financial support from the state.
3. We have not been notified about opening 2021
We need a message from the government that we can open safely in spring 2021. Why do we need a message already now? Well, opening an amusement park is not done in a turn. It takes time to recruit staff, train employees and prepare restaurants, games and attractions.
There is hope!
We are in a very tough situation, but we only manage to open spring 2021-obviously in a safe way.
If you have questions, feel free to ask them here, so we will try to answer them as best we can.
#öppnaGrönan2021
Pleasure Beach Valhalla
TS Member
Grona Lund may be facing bankrupcy
Oh dear that's not great!
Rob
TS Team
B...b....but Sweden are doing everything right!? All is jolly there!?
Hopefully their statement is more putting pressure on the government in Sweden more than anything else. Although if they are other Swedish parks were forced to stay closed in 2021 then it would be no surprise if some simply close for good. You can't keep going for two years with zero revenue.
Hopefully their statement is more putting pressure on the government in Sweden more than anything else. Although if they are other Swedish parks were forced to stay closed in 2021 then it would be no surprise if some simply close for good. You can't keep going for two years with zero revenue.
Ian
TS Team
I guess it depends on the payment terms negotiated with the manufacturer and construction company.
There does seem to be a bit of a misconception that parks can simply down tools on new/underway projects and all will be fine. The reality is contracts are negotiated with payment terms that everyone has agreed to. This isn’t something unique to ride manufacturing. It happens everywhere.
Look at it from a supply chain point of view. Someone like B&M isn’t going to want to have manufactured all that hardware, only to then be told it isn’t needed any more and that they won’t be paid for it. They have their own overheads (rent/mortgages, utilities, staff, taxes, etc.) to pay off, plus their suppliers as well (such as steel manufacturers, electronics companies, hydraulic and pneumatics providers, and the like). I remember John Wardley once discussing the topic and I’m sure he said with Intamin the park had to pay 50% up front for manufacturing to commence and then 50% on final delivery and commissioning of the ride (those percentages may be out, but the principle is correct).
If anyone wants to break from the payment schedule it will need to have been agreed with all parties, unless the party in question wants to risk impacting their financial and credit reputation. Yes, just like you or me, businesses have credit files and similar records which any vendor worth their salt will consult before deciding to enter a contract with them. If the risk is high you turn down the job, or you demand more up front to cover your costs in the event that something goes wrong. Equally, the party left out of pocket may choose to charge late or missed payment fines as well to try and recoup something.
For someone like Disney where a lot of production takes place in house it’s slightly easier, as a lot of their divisions are their own customer (such as design and aspects of theming). But for other parks, it’s a part of the chain which needs to be satisfied.
Either way, hopefully this isn’t quite as drastic as it seems at first glance and the park are using their as a means of gaining financial support if they are told they can’t open.
There does seem to be a bit of a misconception that parks can simply down tools on new/underway projects and all will be fine. The reality is contracts are negotiated with payment terms that everyone has agreed to. This isn’t something unique to ride manufacturing. It happens everywhere.
Look at it from a supply chain point of view. Someone like B&M isn’t going to want to have manufactured all that hardware, only to then be told it isn’t needed any more and that they won’t be paid for it. They have their own overheads (rent/mortgages, utilities, staff, taxes, etc.) to pay off, plus their suppliers as well (such as steel manufacturers, electronics companies, hydraulic and pneumatics providers, and the like). I remember John Wardley once discussing the topic and I’m sure he said with Intamin the park had to pay 50% up front for manufacturing to commence and then 50% on final delivery and commissioning of the ride (those percentages may be out, but the principle is correct).
If anyone wants to break from the payment schedule it will need to have been agreed with all parties, unless the party in question wants to risk impacting their financial and credit reputation. Yes, just like you or me, businesses have credit files and similar records which any vendor worth their salt will consult before deciding to enter a contract with them. If the risk is high you turn down the job, or you demand more up front to cover your costs in the event that something goes wrong. Equally, the party left out of pocket may choose to charge late or missed payment fines as well to try and recoup something.
For someone like Disney where a lot of production takes place in house it’s slightly easier, as a lot of their divisions are their own customer (such as design and aspects of theming). But for other parks, it’s a part of the chain which needs to be satisfied.
Either way, hopefully this isn’t quite as drastic as it seems at first glance and the park are using their as a means of gaining financial support if they are told they can’t open.
Skyscraper
TS Member
Yeah I agree, they would also have been too heavy.I doubt the Banshee trains would have coped with this layout; it's far too compact.
Burbs
TS Team
Well this angle makes it look a little... erm, little (although according to RCDB taller than Inferno).
#lolliger

Photo cred to coasterblog.se
#lolliger

Photo cred to coasterblog.se
Burbs
TS Team
I believe it's the highest point above ground level, as some coasters are listed as having an overall height or tallest drop height, or both in some cases.Great photo! It's an interesting project. Is RCDB saying it's 111.5ft from the tallest piece of track to the lowest? If the station's buried underground, that would add some height to the ride.