Totally agree. I remember seeing Colossus built, I remember the radical change it made for Thorpe Park (my local park) and the who, it was my first full sized coaster, and I remember being hooked (in its better years when it was actually built over the waterfront) by its paths and setting with that music.I read defensive comments a lot about Colossus when someone attacks it. It gets defended for its landscaping and interaction with spectators and I fully accept that.
Then comes the nostalgia argument of "putting Thorpe on the map". I get its nostalgic value as well, although I wouldn't imagine there was anyone here wishing Corkscrew was still limping on today for the same reason.
As a last resort, John Wardley usually gets mentioned, as if that automatically makes it good by default.
However, I notice very few people (I can't recall ever actually) defend it for its ride experience. The closest anyone usually gets to this is "well such and such a coaster is even worse".
By the way, I'm not actually suggesting that Colossus should be removed, just that it's awful to ride and I know deep down that most of you agree with me.
I read defensive comments a lot about Colossus when someone attacks it. It gets defended for its landscaping and interaction with spectators and I fully accept that.
Then comes the nostalgia argument of "putting Thorpe on the map". I get its nostalgic value as well, although I wouldn't imagine there was anyone here wishing Corkscrew was still limping on today for the same reason.
As a last resort, John Wardley usually gets mentioned, as if that automatically makes it good by default.
However, I notice very few people (I can't recall ever actually) defend it for its ride experience. The closest anyone usually gets to this is "well such and such a coaster is even worse".
By the way, I'm not actually suggesting that Colossus should be removed, just that it's awful to ride and I know deep down that most of you agree with me.
I think thats a fairly wrong argument, its a great ride experience.
Totally agree. I remember seeing Colossus built, I remember the radical change it made for Thorpe Park (my local park) and the who, it was my first full sized coaster, and I remember being hooked (in its better years when it was actually built over the waterfront) by its paths and setting with that music.
However it's an awful ride, nobody I ever go with (non enthusiasts) come off enjoying it, I never feel any need to ride it, it's noisy and hugely uncomfortable.
Yeah the John Wardley argument is a strange one, since at the very most he'd have had the job of saying "copy this Brazil one and add 2 inversions, I'm quitting Tussauds, see ya bye". As with all coasters after Nemesis, he was one of a big team who directed developments, so in no way is Colossus really "a John Wardley ride", I doubt he even cares about it to be honest.
Colossus was a cool ride for its time, but the space could be better used now! It's had a good run, but it was always just a copy and a ploy to rework Thorpe as a thrill park. I'd now love to see a much better coaster in its place.
I read defensive comments a lot about Colossus when someone attacks it. It gets defended for its landscaping and interaction with spectators and I fully accept that.
Then comes the nostalgia argument of "putting Thorpe on the map". I get its nostalgic value as well, although I wouldn't imagine there was anyone here wishing Corkscrew was still limping on today for the same reason.
As a last resort, John Wardley usually gets mentioned, as if that automatically makes it good by default.
However, I notice very few people (I can't recall ever actually) defend it for its ride experience. The closest anyone usually gets to this is "well such and such a coaster is even worse".
I was well under 5' when I last rode Colossus in May 2015 and they were still awful. I dread to think what they're like now I'm 5'5/5'6!Colossus trains are awful if you are anything other than a small person
I’m 6’3 18 stone and can only just about fold myself into the seats but the ride is awful on them trains
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You answered your own question there, you're the exception to the rule being a power lifter, I imagine you have huge upper body strength and are able to hold your neck up off the restraints as a result, most people who go to Thorpe are either used to sitting in an office chair or spend all day on the sofa and probably couldn't lift their own head off a pillow without a lot of effort, hence no ability to brace themselves in the turns. We used to call it rag doll syndrome.
A previous career gave me a strong neck so it's not a problem for me either, also a lot of people anticipate the turns wrong, they lean into them (lean to right for a right turn) which is the wrong thing to do if you have no neck muscles, you only have to do that a couple of times and bang your head and you're done for for the rest of the ride.
It's always fun to sit on the Stealth platform and watch people launch, you can instantly tell w
I really enjoy Colossus and even ignoring theming/landscaping I would rank it as either 2nd but probably 3rd best coaster at Thorpe Park.
However I found that the make or break factor for my enjoyment of it entirely depended where you sat. In the front few rows I found it second only to front seat Stealth as best in the park. In the back few rows however it was almost entirely unbearable making it arguably the worst coaster in the park.
Saw on the other hand is a coaster I despise. I am amazed how anyone can bash Colossus for roughness then go on to praise Saw! I enjoyed it in 2009 but since then I have never had a fun experience on it. It is forceful but offers no real adrenaline rush or any decent airtime for that matter. It almost makes Speed at Oakwood feel like a B&M. My abiding memory after enduring Sore is always a banging migraine while sat in traffic in the M25 on the way home. Nasty.
But going back to the point about theming/landscaping/interaction. Why is this dismissed as of secondary importance? This is of course highly arguable but to me is the most important aspect of any ride experience. You spend 60 seconds (if that) on a ride but anywhere up to 2/3 hours queuing or standing around the ride. If that part of the experience is done well it more than makes up for a coaster that is rough around the edges.
True! While Colossus was landscaped very well for what it was, which added so much to that side of the park, it's no reason to keep the coaster.The phrase "you can't polish a turd" comes to mind...
Imagine landscaping to the nth degree a SLC... Does that stop the ride experience (the main aspect of any ride) from being god-awful?
Why is everyone talking about Colossus' removal? Probably won't be for at least 10 years yet.