Slugjc
TS Member
To be honest, most of the most valuable things were pretty much gone by the late 1850s and in the decades following that. However, arguably the most important thing, which is the house, was only stripped in the mid 20th century as you rightly say (structurally etc). There were a couple of great auctions between these times which included things in the gardens and grounds as well as the house, not forgetting the fact that the place was also subject to occupation of soldiers training during WW2 (they can not be held as completely innocent of any damage in my opinion). It has been an interesting place. By the time the Bagshaws got their hands on it, it had already been stripped of its major worth as a whole. They just finished it off by stripping what was left in wood and lead, and whatever else they found of value....in a way of continuing to present the place as a leisure venue. However, planned or not, they literally left the house in a condition to rot, which I find deplorable.
This is true. It also shows that pre historic buildings act (or whatever its called) people had for well over a hundred years. Had no idea what to do with these big empty stalely homes. Some, such as the bagshaws and lord bath at longleat turned to tourist to keep them up. But major difference between longleat and towers s somebody lived there.
Ever since the 16th earl and pugin died. The house has been in decay. Nobody cared it was just a big empty house, expensive to run, upkeep etc. Also letsnot gloss over the fact, that even the earl used it holiday home. For grand fates, entertaining, short stays and odd prayer or two. Too show of his large collections of how a good solider his family was how good a catholic he was.
Like I've said above, with how merlin treats the rest of the park. The house is better of being an empty shell. Actually, makes it more interesting to me personally.