Like that promo image for Valhalla that looked like the front cover of a porno DVD.Well it certainly isn’t any better in HD. Looks like something I’d expect from BPB…
I’ve loved the fright nights marketing over the past two years. I agreeIf Silkstone doesn’t do the marketing for Thorpe then perhaps he should. Last time they put a load of crappy marketing out and branding they were slated badly and came down hard on everyone who criticised it.
They’ve now posted in glorious HD - makes all the difference doesn’t it.
From: https://x.com/thorpepark/status/1786474713621115209?s=46
Varney's Vanity Valley. World's first Valleyless Valley. Obvs.I'm seeing a mountain, a body of water, and an island with a coaster on it. Still not seeing what a Valley has to do with anything?
The funny thing is, they actually originally filed a trademark for Icarus, which could infer that something like this was the original plan. The trademark got rejected because of a flat ride named Icarus at Twinlakes. This led to Hyperia being the name instead.That is absolutely dreadful.
Why on earth didn't they go with a deadulus and Icarus theme. Call the coaster icarus. Call the area Olympus. Or anything greek related.
Greek ruin theming. Massively marketable, a back story that makes sense and is already written for them. So so painful
You mean like Hyperia?Or anything greek related.
You mean like Hyperia?
HYPERIA (Hypereia) A Naiad-nymph daughter of the river Inachus.
I suppose that raises the question, now they've had a chance to ride the coaster, maybe they're concerned that the coaster is as strong as they'd hoped?Granted, I’m no marketing expert by any means, but the approach of the last couple of days is certainly not how I’d approach marketing Hyperia. The coaster itself is the key strength of this project, so why not play to your strengths?
Varney's Vanity Valley, World's first fully dedicated to being a Valleyless Valley to infuse a Valley with no Valley.Varney's Vanity Valley. World's first Valleyless Valley. Obvs.
Nope, wrong park. NEVER mention the competition.infuse - Merlin, can I have a job now please?
Good postThe funny thing is, they actually originally filed a trademark for Icarus, which could infer that something like this was the original plan. The trademark got rejected because of a flat ride named Icarus at Twinlakes. This led to Hyperia being the name instead.
I’ve been quite a bit more accepting of the more explicit backstories in recent rides than most. I absolutely love what Merlin have done with Nemesis Reborn, and I like the more explicit backstory in The Curse at Alton Manor compared to the lack of one in Duel, so unlike some on here, I’m not exactly against the more in-depth and explicit backstories by any stretch.
With that being said, I have to say that I really don’t see the point of heavily promoting the “story” for Hyperia. If there was ever a ride where an in-depth backstory was pretty much redundant, I think this is it. The ride has next to no theming, and unlike many Merlin rides, it pretty much doesn’t appear to focus on theming or storytelling at all.
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again. If I were Thorpe, I’d be ditching any major focus on the theme or story in marketing and just going all in on the coaster itself. Just hammer home that silhouette of the layout and its giant elements and hammer home the records, with only the very vague “find your fearless” imagery present as an indication of the theme/style. To be fair, I think they’ve done that pretty well up to this point, but the marketing seems to have taken a bit of a weird turn in the last couple of days.
Granted, I’m no marketing expert by any means, but the approach of the last couple of days is certainly not how I’d approach marketing Hyperia. The coaster itself is the key strength of this project, so why not play to your strengths? I fear that this sudden focus on the theme and “story” of Hyperia will only invite criticism regarding the very minimalistic nature of the actual ride theming.
I’m not sure that’s necessarily it. The silhouette of the elements, the records and all the associated “killer imagery” of having a massive coaster would be exactly the same regardless of how it actually rode, and if I’m remembering correctly, the backstory was first revealed in the themed room before the ride had ever tested.I suppose that raises the question, now they've had a chance to ride the coaster, maybe they're concerned that the coaster is as strong as they'd hoped?
Whilst Shambhala isn't "Heavily" themed, it's not half bad in that department mind. It splashes down right in the middle of a fully themed Himalayan village and has theming from the archway to the entrance. It has more theming than your average Merlin coaster, let alone a hyper.I’m not sure that’s necessarily it. The silhouette of the elements, the records and all the associated “killer imagery” of having a massive coaster would be exactly the same regardless of how it actually rode, and if I’m remembering correctly, the backstory was first revealed in the themed room before the ride had ever tested.
For clarity, I have never objected to this ride being more minimally themed. I think it’s pretty rare for a hyper coaster to be really heavily themed (even the hypers in heavily themed parks like Europa Park and PortAventura have relatively minimal theming), and a ride of that size and scale can really speak for itself. I actually really like the ethereal style and imagery and the whole “find your fearless” vibe they’re going for with the ride.
However, what I would say is that if they’re going to go for a minimally themed ride and focus on the coaster itself, I think they needed to go all in with that approach and stick to that in their marketing. I feel that this approach of heavily bigging up the “backstory” sets people up for the ride itself being heavily themed, which will only invite criticism of the more minimalistic nature of the actual theming when people get to see it.