What if say, it was built arayton or Alton. Would it be perved diffretly
What gets me is Icon clearly divides opinion. Would it be perceived differently if it was built at Alton, or Drayton for instance?
What if say, it was built arayton or Alton. Would it be perved diffretly
As such, there was a lot of hype for Icon, and expectations were very, very high. People were expecting it to be comfortably the best coaster in the UK, one of the best coasters in Europe and possibly one of the best coasters in the world. The hype for Icon was absolutely unbelievable, and dare I say the biggest hype train I’ve ever seen for a new UK coaster before or since. People were going on about how this was the coaster that would make the whole world look at the UK in jealousy, this was the coaster that would revolutionise the UK coaster industry forever, this was the coaster that would give the UK a coaster right up there with some of the world’s modern greats in terms of reverence.
Whether that's down to the ride, the marketing or other factors who knows, but I hope the park still has the ambition and finances to build another big coaster within a few years. And one that does get the punters flocking in.
Removal of the Mouse didn't fundamentally change anything about Icon. If that colours your perception that feels like a weird way of thinking about things ?Issue with Icon is that they removed a fantastic thrill machine and installed an average family coaster in the same season.
I don't rate Icon differently because of the Mouse, but I don't really like Icon, whereas the Mouse was one of my favourite coasters, so I do view it as a downgrade. All subjective though.Removal of the Mouse didn't fundamentally change anything about Icon. If that colours your perception that feels like a weird way of thinking about things ?
If you don’t mind me asking, what has changed about Icon visually? I admittedly haven’t visited Blackpool since 2019, but is it not the same as it’s ever been in that regard?Icon did used to be great at being a queue shifter and visually impressive, but neither of those things are the case now.
Nearly all of the wood on the Wild Mouse was chipped, the station was grubby and the planting questionable. You’re reaching here with regards criticism of a wildly different coaster proposition.The mirrors got dusty and the gold on the handrail down the stairs got chipped rather quickly, if I recall correctly.
The lavender going down the stairs needs a good prune too.
Nearly all of the wood on the Wild Mouse was chipped, the station was grubby and the planting questionable. You’re reaching here with regards criticism of a wildly different coaster proposition.
Ah yes I didn’t see that, nevertheless though there’s a definite undertone of ICON being undervalued due to the removal of the mouseAre you not debating with the wrong poster here? @rob666 is kindly just providing details of where Icon looks visibly knackered, he's not bringing the rodent into it?
A few things to pick up on: -
Icon didn’t fail because it was a bad ride, since it clearly isn’t. I don’t see there to be any larger factor in it not providing the uptick in visits than its marketing failure.
I agree there were big expectations for Icon. I’m not sure I’d characterise them as expectations of a world class coaster (at least from the sensible individuals amongst us). There’s a difference between hoping for the ride to be good and expecting it to be.
There is room for a new coaster without demolishing other rides - see for example, the empty Bowl-a-Drome arcade, the FY4 AstroTurf, The Hub, AstroSwirl arcade etc.
And finally, Icon’s queue is full of rosemary. The lavender died. Predictably.