Well I suppose this then depends on what we class as a family or thrill ride. Blade is a family ride I agree with that but Enterprise was surely classed as a thrill ride. The height restriction was more accommodating but can you imagine 5 year olds going on Enterprise. Maybe they did but it seemed like quite an extreme ride
thrill
/θrɪl/
noun
1. a sudden feeling of excitement and pleasure.
"the thrill of jumping out of an aeroplane"
You can have a family thrill ride, the terms "family" and "thrill" aren't mutually exclusive. Mandrill Mayhem is definitely a thrilling coaster, by definition, but it also suitable for all ages.
Enterprise is an intense ride, but it's exciting and suitable for everyone who meets the height limit.
If you go back to Towers' "golden era", pretty much all of the "adult" lands had at least one ride suitable for all ages, or at least those who had outgrown the then Storybook Land. Ug Land had Ug Bugs (I spent way too many days on it, RIP).
Ye but there's no family rides in Valley and X sector because the areas are for thrill rides.
There aren't any family rides in those areas because they were all removed (flats), that's exactly what we're discussing here, whereas previously (in years gone by) there were.
The only area that you need to keep sacrosanct, and not have a wide mix, is CBeebies.
Take a look through some of the TowersStreet archives to see what other rides the areas had, aside from coasters, to see what we mean when we say that everything used to have (and still needs) a wide appeal for people of all ages. -
https://www.towerstimes.co.uk/histo...1481464143093-ac536e71-353ccad5-251f060a-5161