DiogoJ42 said:
I firmly believe that in twenty years time, schools won't even be teaching how to hold a pen, never mind hand writing. I wonder if future excuses for not handing in homework will include "the dog ate my iPad"?
It'll be a sad day when cursive script is banished forever. I also see it slipping away and would like to see a rearguard action to save it, in a similar vein to endangered languages.
For those who wonder why, there are so many reasons:
1. Typed script homogenises everything it touches; people lose a part of their personality if they lose their ability not just to write by hand, but to choose the style in which they do it. I actively chose to make my handwriting small, italicised and copperplate, and I could do that because I was taught the dexterity needed to control my hands: I think this choice reflects, in a way, who I am.
2. Cursive script is beautiful (and its individuality is linked to its beauty in a way). To see old, handwritten documents gives such a sharp sense of the unique times and characters of human history in a way that a typed transcript never can.
I'll allow that old typewriter script has character in a similar way, but even in that, it differs from the modern, clinical homogenousness of Calibri script printed on a laser printer: there was ink, ribbon; the script produced differed with the make of machine; the paper was manually handled, smudged, marked or corrected.
3. I believe there is a link between imagination, intellectual process and manual creativity. Your brain controls your hand; the cursive script is unmediated; the source of its power is the source of the thought and one complements the other: there is no lag (even of microseconds) for a machine to process something; no mis-struck keys; nothing underlined in red or green, forcing perfection on you and interrupting your flow.
Handwriting is worth fighting for.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2