I'm sure we've had this discussion before, but I find it difficult to debate with you
@MakoMania , because you essentially communicate on this issue in press release copy, like some sort of Seaworld-bot. In another thread of yours covering another of Seaworld's declining regional parks, you stated that "I would argue that with a robust enrichment programme, social grouping and habitat design, life in an accredited zoo or aquarium can be just as fulfilling as in the wild."
Which, to me, even as someone who has worked at zoo attractions and sees the value in public conservation and education, reads as completely mental. As does your above post. I never said anything about the level or standard of care at Seaworld to encourage that kind of corporate spiel! Frankly, I don't know anything about it, and to be honest, all you know is what Seaworld choose to tell you.
I think they've done some great work in terms of animal rescue, but you'd never write anything as hyperbolic about a Merlin Sealife Centre, or any other attraction that exists to make profit as part of a huge corporate structure. They're in talks with Donald Trump's former PR manager to turn the franchise around!
Donald Trump's PR manager!!! Does this strike you as an organisation dedicated to marine care out the goodness of their own hearts? They're desperate, and no amount of outreach or coastal work can disguise that the central attraction of the park is now largely percieved as inhumane. It's bad news for Seaworld, but ultimately, it's just an evolution of attitudes.
Nonetheless, although I think the public perception towards the park would have been transforming regardless of Blackfish, I don't agree with the more extremist tactics of pressure groups such as PETA. As such, I'm sorry that any public representative of Seaworld has been forced to endure any situation beyond their control...
All I'm saying is, looking at the figures: This is going to have be one hell of a rapids ride.