Dar said:
In terms of plans, rough is the same as inaccurate. If the track is going to be as per the plan, then so are footers. The "it's a rough NoLimits export" line doesn't work if you're arguing that the rest is accurate.
Inaccurate means the track will deviate from the course that is shown. Rough means that to the unobservant eye it'll look exactly the same but there will be minor differences. Look at
Project Helix and the recent modifications for a good example of the difference between a rough plan (in this case POV) and the more recent ones.
And no the footers don't have to be accurate because whoever came up with these plans was obviously pushing to a tight deadline and cutting corners or they wouldn’t have done a quick model in NoLimits but something more accurate like Saw's plans.
Here’s my theory of what happened:
During the design stage they created the track with NoLimits as an example for Gerstlauer to work from. This could even have been done by Wardley himself; he did something similar with Thirteen. No supports would have been added at this stage as this takes time, makes the model harder to edit and is only an extra for aesthetic purposes.
So they hand the model over to Gerstlauer, but then the folks in Merlin's planning department request something for them to show on the plans. This would have been done on a tight deadline so the planning application could go in ASAP. We also know they were behind schedule at this point as the design for the scenery had to be added later. So someone does a quick transfer of the files, adding supports as quick as they can. They make mistakes because they're in a rush (we know this from the intersecting supports), but it doesn’t matter as the model is only for completeness, hence why it says so in the plans.
That’s why I believe the track can be accurate even if the supports aren’t.
As for the other points yes there is a lot more excavation but I believe they are behind schedule. If they weren’t I’m sure track would have started going up immediately after the park closed. Wasn't it the first or second day of the 2009 closed season that Thirteen's Secret Weapon arrived to a fan fair of marketing? Plus someone on TTF has since been to the car parks and all the track seems to still be there. I can only conclude they weren’t purposefully delaying but still have work to do. Plus the lower end of the site probably needed excavating first for access reasons.
Rob said:
The plans may seem to fit when looking from above. However I wish anyone luck trying to show that they match when looking from ground level, as they just don't! If the plans were to be corrected then it would mean that some of the track would go straight through an already build concrete wall, now that's definitely not going to happen.
I was on park when these pictures were taken and while it is deep it isn’t ridiculously so. As I said in my original post it might not be track at the very bottom. Plus to put it in perspective the lower level around Oblivion’s pit is about the same depth. It’s made up of similar concrete slabs which can be seen on that picture.
Dave said:
The run ins even considering theming potential could have been created without the sheer excavation and wall shoring that is happening here.
Also that overlay is not correctly sized.
Sheer is probably an aesthetic choice to match Oblivion next door. And I did note it is not to scale.