BigAl
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Forbidden Journey
Actually, I've read that SOB wasn't built very well to save money and it's entirely Paramount's fault (although RCA should have known better than to go ahead and not design a structurally sound ride for them just to save money on it). Had it been done properly, perhaps it would still be operating (loop and all) and perhaps woodies might not have such a bad image with some folks?
Also, there's a number of woodies built before 2000 such as the original Texas Giant and Rattler (TG having been recently replaced with NTG by Rocky Mountain Coasters and Rattler being replaced with another RMC for next year), Hercules and Mean Streak which weren't designed properly and it meant that shortly down the line these coasters had big problems with comfort. Designers apparently tried to create amazing looking elements (although I've yet to find one on Rattler at least ) without taking into account how the trains would react to them and the supports under the lengths of track, such as the big helices and over-banks, etc...
I've read about maintenance trying to slow them down or stiffen supports to stop bumps being so violent and workers not really understanding the structure of the rides when replacing supports which basically ended up making the rides worse than if they'd just left them to shake themselves to pieces.
So if all that is correct, the 90's didn't really give wooden coasters a good name.
However, these new hybrid woodies are completely different. Besides the fact that they have been designed properly to comply with newer regulations since the older woodies above, these have a lot more metal in them then older wooden coasters. Some might say that these aren't proper wooden coasters but if the ride experience is great and they're built well, who really gives a damn what they should be classified as?
As I've said, New Texas Giant is doing very well so my guess would be that this will do just as well, if not better.
Also, there's a number of woodies built before 2000 such as the original Texas Giant and Rattler (TG having been recently replaced with NTG by Rocky Mountain Coasters and Rattler being replaced with another RMC for next year), Hercules and Mean Streak which weren't designed properly and it meant that shortly down the line these coasters had big problems with comfort. Designers apparently tried to create amazing looking elements (although I've yet to find one on Rattler at least ) without taking into account how the trains would react to them and the supports under the lengths of track, such as the big helices and over-banks, etc...
I've read about maintenance trying to slow them down or stiffen supports to stop bumps being so violent and workers not really understanding the structure of the rides when replacing supports which basically ended up making the rides worse than if they'd just left them to shake themselves to pieces.
So if all that is correct, the 90's didn't really give wooden coasters a good name.
However, these new hybrid woodies are completely different. Besides the fact that they have been designed properly to comply with newer regulations since the older woodies above, these have a lot more metal in them then older wooden coasters. Some might say that these aren't proper wooden coasters but if the ride experience is great and they're built well, who really gives a damn what they should be classified as?
As I've said, New Texas Giant is doing very well so my guess would be that this will do just as well, if not better.